Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP /DE/ (Form: 10-Q, Received: 08/07/2009 14:21:32)
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 28, 2009

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 1-10079

 

 

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   94-2885898

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

198 Champion Court, San Jose, California 95134

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(408) 943-2600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   ¨     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   x    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨     No   x

The total number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock as of August 3, 2009 was 154,905,459.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

INDEX

 

          Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Forward-Looking Statements

  

Item 1.

   Financial Statements    4

Item 2.

   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    35

Item 3.

   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk    45

Item 4.

   Controls and Procedures    46
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION   
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings    47
Item 1A.    Risk Factors    47
Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds    47
Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities    47
Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders    47
Item 5.    Other Information    47
Item 6.    Exhibits    48

Signatures

   49

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Forward-Looking Statements

The discussion in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements that are not historical in nature, but are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, statements related to our plans to define, design and develop new programmable products and solutions; our ability to expand the adoption of our flagship PSoC devices; our plans to expand our customer base; the markets we intend to pursue; our continued plans to pursue flexible manufacturing capabilities; our ability to complete the divestiture of non-strategic, underperforming businesses while continuing to consider strategic relationships; our plans to transition our work to lower costs centers abroad; the number and impact of future personnel terminations and the expenses related thereto; our expectations, including the timing, related to our restructuring activities; our expectations regarding our active litigation matters and our ability to defend ourselves in those matters; the calculation of our unrecognized tax benefits, including events that could materially change the amount of such benefits; the impact of the distribution of Cypress’s ownership in SunPower; our expectations related to the Simtek acquisition; the adequacy of our cash and working capital positions and our intended uses for such cash and capital; our ability to obtain additional financing if needed; the value of our investments in auction rate securities, and whether such declines are temporary in nature; and our expectations regarding our outstanding warranty liability, our plans to repurchase stock, plans with respect to disposal activities/assets, potential payments to Grace, and our expectations related to interest rate fluctuations. We use words such as “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “future,” “intend” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof and are based on our current expectations, beliefs and intentions regarding future events or our financial performance and the information available to management as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, we assume no responsibility to update any such forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those expected, discussed or projected in the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to, the state and future of the general economy and its impact on the markets we serve and our investments; the current economic and credit conditions; our ability to transform our business with a leading portfolio of programmable products; the number and nature of our competitors; our ability to develop new products; the expected impact of the revenue model conversion of certain distributors in Asia on our revenues and gross margin; the changing environment and/or cycles of the semiconductor industry; the successful integration and achievement of the objectives of acquired businesses; our ability to efficiently manage our manufacturing facilities and achieve our cost goals emanating from flexible manufacturing; our success in our pending litigation matters, our ability to manage our investments and interest rate and exchange rate exposure; our ability to achieve liquidity in our investments, and the materialization of one or more of the risks set forth above or in Item 1A ( Risk Factors ) in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Spin-Off of SunPower Corporation (“SunPower”)

Upon completion of the spin-off of SunPower on September 29, 2008, Cypress no longer consolidated SunPower’s financial results beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 or addresses risk factors associated with SunPower’s business, operations, financial condition and results of operations. For a detailed discussion of the risks affecting SunPower, investors should refer to SunPower’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 28, 2009. The contents of such Form 10-Q are expressly not incorporated by reference herein.

 

3


Table of Contents
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

 

     June 28,
2009
    December 28,
2008
 
    

(In thousands, except

per-share amounts)

 
ASSETS     

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 212,842      $ 204,749   

Short-term investments

     32,800        33,043   

Accounts receivable, net

     84,415        91,943   

Inventories, net

     90,586        121,889   

Other current assets

     57,705        60,755   
                

Total current assets

     478,348        512,379   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     282,072        296,789   

Goodwill

     31,831        31,836   

Intangible assets, net

     16,628        18,678   

Other long-term assets

     75,852        76,077   
                

Total assets

   $ 884,731      $ 935,759   
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 50,385      $ 42,570   

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

     39,567        44,115   

Deferred revenues less cost of revenues

     61,932        82,465   

Income taxes payable

     3,818        4,214   

Convertible debt

     27,726        27,023   

Other current liabilities

     51,561        63,595   
                

Total current liabilities

     234,989        263,982   

Deferred income taxes and other tax liabilities

     24,360        22,586   

Other long-term liabilities

     3,752        3,737   
                

Total liabilities

     263,101        290,305   
                

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding

     —          —     

Common stock, $.01 par value, 650,000 and 650,000 shares authorized; 218,945 and 204,849 shares issued; 147,557 and 136,503 shares outstanding at June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008, respectively

     2,189        2,048   

Additional paid-in-capital

     2,169,688        2,044,679   

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     (1,236     2,533   

Accumulated deficit

     (545,971     (417,604
                
     1,624,670        1,631,656   

Less: shares of common stock held in treasury, at cost; 71,390 and 68,346 shares at June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008, respectively

     (1,003,040     (986,202
                

Total stockholders’ equity

     621,630        645,454   
                

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 884,731      $ 935,759   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands, except per-share amounts)  

Revenues

   $ 155,784      $ 209,580      $ 295,093      $ 377,962   

Costs and expenses:

        

Cost of revenues

     98,672        107,852        203,966        196,085   

Research and development

     48,196        45,392        98,342        89,542   

Selling, general and administrative

     53,069        61,111        113,784        118,279   

Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles

     834        1,658        2,153        3,317   

Restructuring costs

     1,089        1,958        7,135        4,370   
                                

Total costs and expenses, net

     201,860        217,971        425,380        411,593   

Operating loss

     (46,076     (8,391     (130,287     (33,631

Interest income

     496        5,511        1,107        14,817   

Interest expense

     (466     (9,656     (941     (19,218

Other income (expense), net

     2,085        (2,451     450        (4,754
                                

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

     (43,961     (14,987     (129,671     (42,786

Income tax benefit (provision)

     (1,324     14,269        (3,949     12,019   

Loss from continuing operations

     (45,285     (718     (133,620     (30,767

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

     —          17,399        —          24,364   
                                

Net income (loss)

   $ (45,285   $ 16,681      $ (133,620   $ (6,403
                                

Net income (loss) per share—Basic:

        

Continuing operations

   $ (0.32   $ (0.01   $ (0.97   $ (0.20

Discontinued operations

     —          0.12        —          0.16   
                                

Net income (loss) per share—Basic

   $ (0.32   $ 0.11      $ (0.97   $ (0.04
                                

Net income (loss) per share—Diluted:

        

Continuing operations

   $ (0.32   $ (0.01   $ (0.97   $ (0.20

Discontinued operations

     —          0.11        —          0.16   
                                

Net income (loss) per share—Diluted

   $ (0.32   $ 0.10      $ (0.97   $ (0.04
                                

Shares used in net income (loss) per share calculation:

        

Basic

     141,107        150,675        137,932        152,818   

Diluted

     141,107        161,732        137,932        152,818   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Cash flow from operating activities:

    

Net loss

   $ (133,620   $ (6,403

Less: income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

     —          24,364   
                

Loss from continuing operations

     (133,620     (30,767

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     29,191        39,180   

Stock-based compensation expense

     85,923        35,363   

Non-cash interest expense and other non-cash expense on adoption of APB 14-1

     789        14,649   

Impairment of investments

     1,731        4,468   

Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs

     —          1,557   

Reduction in allowance for uncollectible SPAP loans

     (375     (96

Restructuring charges

     7,135        4,370   

Loss on sale or retirement of property and equipment, net

     645        3,557   

Loss on sale of investments, net

     693        —     

Deferred income taxes

     2,394        (20,723

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of divestitures:

    

Accounts receivable

     7,527        (7,470

Inventories

     27,308        (20,493

Other assets

     1,993        46,059   

Accounts payable and other liabilities

     (21,074     (31,998

Deferred revenues less cost of revenues

     (20,533     11,503   
                

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities—continuing operations

     (10,273     49,159   

Net cash used in operating activities—discontinued operations

     —          (39,371
                

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     (10,273     9,788   
                

Cash flow from investing activities:

    

Purchases of available-for-sale investments

     (21,318     (109,654

Proceeds from sales or maturities of available-for-sale investments

     20,762        169,110   

Net contributions or (distributions) of deferred compensation plan

     92        644   

Acquisitions of property and equipment

     (11,455     (21,162

Proceeds from settlement of SPAP loan principal

     14        242   

Proceeds from sales of property and equipment

     3,536        44   

Cash paid for other investments

     —          (1,737
                

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities—continuing operations

     (8,369     37,487   

Net cash used in investing activities—discontinued operations

     —          (76,187
                

Net cash used in investing activities

     (8,369     (38,700
                

Cash flow from financing activities:

    

Redemption of convertible subordinated notes

     —          (6

Repurchases of common shares

     (11,172     (277,073

Withholdings of common shares for tax obligations on vested restricted stock

     (5,666     (4,489

Proceeds from issuance of common shares under employee stock plans

     43,573        15,390   
                

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities—continuing operations

     26,735        (266,178

Net cash provided by financing activities—discontinued operations

     —          12,780   
                

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     26,735        (253,398
                

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents-discontinued operations

     —          7,107   
                

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     8,093        (275,203

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning period

     204,749        1,093,657   
                

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

     212,842        818,454   

Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations, end of period

     —          (189,543
                

Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, end of period

   $ 212,842      $ 628,911   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Fiscal Years

Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (“Cypress” or the “Company”) reports on a fiscal-year basis and we end our quarters on the Sunday closest to the end of the applicable calendar quarter, except in a 53-week fiscal year, in which case the additional week falls into the fourth quarter of that fiscal year. Fiscal 2009 has 53 weeks and fiscal 2008 had 52 weeks. The second quarter of fiscal 2009 ended on June 28, 2009 and the second quarter of fiscal 2008 ended on June 29, 2008.

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to state fairly the financial information included therein. The financial data should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

On September 29, 2008, we completed the spin-off of SunPower Corporation (“SunPower”), a majority-owned subsidiary through the distribution of a tax-free stock dividend to Cypress’s stockholders. As a result, our historical financial statements have been restated to account for SunPower as a discontinued operation for all periods presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. See Note 2 for further discussion.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements relate to the discussion of Cypress’s continuing operations.

Certain prior year balances have been revised to conform to current year presentation, including the retrospective application of adopting FSP APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”, (“FSP APB 14-1”). Under FSP APB 14-1, the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly or partially in cash upon conversion must be accounted for separately in a manner reflective of our nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. Previous guidance provided for accounting for this type of convertible debt instrument entirely as debt. We have retrospectively applied this change in accounting to affected accounts for all periods presented. Refer to Note 10 for more information.

The consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 28, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, acquired contingencies, transaction costs, in-process research and development and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS No. 141(R), changes in an acquired entity’s deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. SFAS No. 141(R) was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted this pronouncement in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and the impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements will depend upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions we could consummate in the future.

In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued FSP APB 14-1, which clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion, including partial cash settlement. The FSP specifies that an issuer of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components of the instruments in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate when interest costs are recognized in subsequent periods. The FSP was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and retrospective application is required for all periods presented. As a result of our adoption of this pronouncement we recorded additional non-cash interest and other expense of approximately $0.8 million and $14.6 million during the six months ended June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008, respectively.

 

7


Table of Contents

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS 142-3”). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142. The intent of FSP FAS 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations,” and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The FSP was effective for financial statements issued after December 15, 2008. We adopted this pronouncement in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and the adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 132(R)-1, “ Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets ” (“FSP 132(R)-1”). This FSP amends SFAS No. 132(R) to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The FSP requires disclosures surrounding how investment allocation decisions are made, including the factors that are pertinent to an understanding of investment policies and strategies. Additional disclosures include (a) the major categories of plan assets, (b) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, and (c) the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on changes in plan assets for the period and the significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The disclosures are required to be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact of FSP 132(R)-1.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 157-4, “ Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Order” . FSP 157-4 provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities under SFAS No.157 Fair Value Measurements. The FSP relates to determining fair values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms what SFAS No. 157 states is the objective of fair value measurement—to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed forced transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. The FSP was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP 157-4 did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 141R-1 “ Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies” (“FSP 141R-1”). This FSP amends the provisions in SFAS No. 141R for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. FSP 141R-1 eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria in SFAS No.141R and instead carries forward most of the provisions in SFAS No. 141 for acquired contingencies. FSP 141R-1 is effective for contingent assets and contingent liabilities acquired in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008. The impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements will depend upon the nature, terms and size of acquisitions we could consummate in the future.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “ Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, which amends FASB Statement No. 107 , “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” , (“SFAS No. 107”), to require an entity to provide interim disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments within the scope of SFAS No. 107 and to include disclosures related to the methods and significant assumptions used in estimating those instruments. This FSP was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of these pronouncements did not have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 “ Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary-Impairments ”. This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities and improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. Under this FSP, if the debt security’s market value is below amortized cost and we either intend to sell the security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery, we would record an other-than-temporary impairment charge to other income and expense, net. If we do not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery, the revised guidance requires us to determine the portion of the other-than-temporary impairment related to credit factors, or the credit loss portion, and the portion that is not related to credit factors, or the non-credit loss portion. The credit loss portion is the difference between the amortized cost of the security and our best estimate of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security and is recorded as a charge to other income and expense, net. The non-credit loss portion is the difference between the decline in fair value and the credit loss portion of the other-than-temporary impairment and is recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss). At adoption, the non-credit loss portion of the other-than-temporary impairment to date is to be recorded to other comprehensive income (loss), offset by an entry to the retained earnings as a one-time adjustment. As a result of our adoption of this FSP, we reclassified the non-credit portion of the previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses related to our auction rate securities of $5.3 million, from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income and loss.

 

8


Table of Contents

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS No. 165”), which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This statement sets forth the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements. SFAS No. 165 also requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date—that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This statement was effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or related footnotes.

In June 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 . The statement confirmed that the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) will become the single official source of authoritative U.S. GAAP (other than guidance issued by the SEC), superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”), and related literature. After that date, only one level of authoritative U.S. GAAP will exist. All other literature will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification does not change U.S. GAAP; instead, it introduces a new structure that is organized in an easily accessible, user-friendly online research system. The Codification, which changes the referencing of financial standards, becomes effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this Codification in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 is not expected to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements or related footnotes.

 

9


Table of Contents

NOTE 2. SUNPOWER

The following table summarizes our historical ownership interest in SunPower:

 

     As of  
     June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
 

Number of shares of SunPower Class B common stock owned by Cypress

   —      44.5 million   

As a percentage of SunPower’s outstanding capital stock

   —      55

As a percentage of SunPower’s outstanding capital stock on a fully diluted basis

   —      52

As a percentage of total voting power of SunPower’s outstanding capital stock

   —      90

Spin-Off of SunPower

In the third quarter of 2008, a committee of our Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved the distribution of the SunPower Class B common stock held by us to Cypress’s stockholders. On September 29, 2008 we completed the distribution of 42.0 million shares of SunPower Class B common stock to our stockholders (the “Spin-Off”). The distribution was made pro rata to our stockholders of record as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on September 17, 2008 (the “Record Date”). As a result of the Spin-Off, each of our stockholders received approximately 0.274 of a share of SunPower Class B common stock for each share of Cypress common stock held as of the Record Date. The market value of the distribution was approximately $2.6 billion based on the closing price of SunPower’s common stock on September 29, 2008.

We received a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in April 2008 with respect to certain tax issues arising under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code in connection with the Spin-Off. The distribution was structured to be tax-free to Cypress and our stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except in respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares.

Discontinued Operations:

Our historical consolidated financial statements have been recast to account for SunPower as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Accordingly, we have reflected the results of operations of SunPower prior to the Spin-Off as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The following table summarizes the results of operations related to the discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 29, 2008:

 

     Three months
ended
   

Six months

ended

 

(In thousands)

   June 29,
2008
    June 29,
2008
 

Revenue

   $ 382,751      $ 656,452   

Costs and expenses, net

     344,021        603,874   
                

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

     38,730        52,578   

Income tax provision

     (7,614     (9,419

Minority interest in income from discontinued operations

     (13,717     (18,795
                

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

   $ 17,399      $ 24,364   
                

 

10


Table of Contents

Adjustments to Cypress’s Stock Plans:

See Note 8 for a discussion of the adjustments approved by our Board to our stock plans as a result of the Spin-Off.

Amended Tax Sharing Agreement:

See Note 13 for a discussion of the amended tax sharing agreement between SunPower and us as a result of the Spin-Off.

NOTE 3. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The carrying amount of goodwill at June 28, 2009 was $31.8 million in the Consumer and Computation Division (“CCD”) and was unchanged from the balance at December 28, 2008. CCD is the only reportable business segment with goodwill.

Intangible Assets

The following tables present details of our intangible assets:

 

As of June 28, 2009

   Gross    Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
     (In thousands)

Purchased technology

   $ 100,134    $ (87,401   $ 12,733

Patents, tradenames, customer relationships and backlog

     22,009      (21,723     286

Other

     4,297      (4,116     181
                     

Total acquisition-related intangible assets

     126,440      (113,240     13,200

Non-acquisition related intangible assets

     8,409      (4,981     3, 428
                     

Total intangible assets

   $ 134,849    $ (118,221   $ 16,628
                     

As of December 28, 2008

   Gross    Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
     (In thousands)

Purchased technology

   $ 100,134    $ (86,040   $ 14,094

Patents, tradenames, customer relationships and backlog

     22,009      (21,007     1,002

Other

     4,297      (4,041     256
                     

Total acquisition-related intangible assets

     126,440      (111,088     15,352

Non-acquisition related intangible assets

     7,474      (4,148     3,326
                     

Total intangible assets

   $ 133,914    $ (115,236   $ 18,678
                     

As of June 28, 2009, the estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets was as follows:

 

(In thousands)

    

2009 (remaining six months)

   $ 2,162

2010

     3,920

2011

     3,746

2012

     3,377

2013 and thereafter

     3,423
      

Total future amortization expense

   $ 16,628
      

 

11


Table of Contents

NOTE 4. RESTRUCTURING

We recorded restructuring charges of $7.1 million and $4.4 million during the six months ended June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008, respectively. The amount recorded during the six months ended June 28, 2009 included a provision of $8.0 million for the Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan offset by a credit of $0.9 million for the Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan.

Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan

During the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we initiated a restructuring plan, as part of a company-wide cost saving initiative aimed to reduce operating costs in response to the economic downturn, which continued into the second quarter of 2009 (“Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan”). In accordance with SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Post Employment Benefits” (“SFAS No. 112”) and SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS No. 146”), at June 28, 2009 we recorded a total of $19.8 million under the Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan, of which $19.7 million was related to personnel costs and $0.1 million was related to other exit costs. The determination of when we accrue for severance and benefits costs, and which standard applies, depends on whether the termination benefits are provided under a one-time benefit arrangement as defined by SFAS No. 146 or under an on-going benefit arrangement as described by SFAS No. 112. Restructuring activities related to personnel costs are summarized as follows:

 

(In thousands)

      

Balance as of December 28, 2008

   $ 7,374   

Provision

     7,741   

Non cash forgiveness of employee loans

     (73

Cash payments

     (3,214
        

Balance as of March 29, 2009

     11,828   

Provision

     327   

Cash payments

     (6,311
        

Balance as of June 28, 2009

   $ 5,844   
        

Upon completion of our restructuring activities we expect to eliminate approximately 778 positions of which approximately 431 positions are manufacturing related positions and 347 are corporate and other related positions.

As of June 28, 2009, approximately 542 of the employees to be terminated in these restructurings have been terminated and the majority of the remaining 236 employee terminations are expected to be completed by the end of fiscal 2009.

Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we implemented a restructuring plan to exit our manufacturing facility located in Round Rock, Texas (“Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan”). The Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan included the termination of employees and the disposal of assets, primarily consisting of land, building and manufacturing equipment, located in the Texas facility. The Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan did not involve the discontinuation of any material product lines or other functions.

To date, we recorded total restructuring charges of $9.5 million related to the Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan. We recorded $9.9 million of expense in fiscal 2008 and $0.5 million of expense in fiscal 2007. We also recorded a $0.9 million credit in fiscal 2009 which relates to the $1.5 million net gain on the sale of equipment located at our Texas facility partially offset by the $0.6 million workforce reserve. Of the total restructuring charges, $8.0 million was related primarily to personnel costs and $1.5 million was related to property, plant and equipment and other exit costs.

Personnel Costs:

Restructuring activities related to personnel costs are summarized as follows:

 

(In thousands)

      

Balance as of December 28, 2008

   $ 2,721   

Additional provision

     518   

Cash payments

     (2,476
        

Balance as of March 29, 2009

     763   

Additional provision

     60   

Cash payments

     (629
        

Balance as of June 28, 2009

   $ 194   
        

 

12


Table of Contents

We completed the termination of the remaining employees in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. These employees were primarily in manufacturing functions, and the remaining balance related to benefits is expected to be paid by the third quarter of fiscal 2009.

Property, Plant and Equipment:

The Texas facility ceased operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. As our management has committed to a plan to dispose of the assets associated with the facility by sale, we have classified the assets as held for sale and valued the assets at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Fair value was determined by market prices estimated by third parties that specialize in sales of such assets. Based on this analysis in fiscal 2008, we recorded a write-down of $1.9 million related to the assets and $1.2 million of related disposal and other facility costs.

The following table summarizes the net book value of the remaining restructured assets that were classified as held for sale and included in “Other current assets” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008:

 

     June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
     (In thousands)

Land

   $ 994    $ 994

Equipment

     373      1,112

Buildings and leasehold improvements

     6,430      6,430
             

Total property, plant and equipment, net

   $ 7,797    $ 8,536
             

We expect to complete the disposal of the remaining restructured assets by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009; however our ability to complete the sale of any restructured assets may be impacted by the current economic and credit conditions.

NOTE 5. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

Accounts Receivable, Net

 

     As of  
     June 28,
2009
    December 28,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Accounts receivable, gross

   $ 88,689      $ 96,027   

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and sales returns

     (4,274     (4,084
                

Total accounts receivable, net

   $ 84,415      $ 91,943   
                

Inventories, Net

 

     As of
     June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
     (In thousands)

Raw materials

   $ 17,488    $ 16,989

Work-in-process

     52,983      76,049

Finished goods

     20,115      28,851
             

Total inventories, net

   $ 90,586    $ 121,889
             

 

13


Table of Contents

Other Current Assets

 

     As of
     June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
     (In thousands)

Deferred tax assets

   $ 541    $ 1,233

Receivable from SunPower

     18,004      18,697

Prepaid expenses

     22,487      24,093

Assets held for sale (see Note 4)

     7,797      8,536

Other current assets

     8,876      8,196
             

Total other current assets

   $ 57,705    $ 60,755
             

 

14


Table of Contents

Other Long-Term Assets

 

     As of
     June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
     (In thousands)

Employee deferred compensation plan

   $ 21,783    $ 20,246

Investments:

     

Debt securities

     34,582      35,701

Equity securities

     2,152      1,788

Other assets

     17,335      18,342
             

Total other long-term assets

   $ 75,852    $ 76,077
             

Other Current Liabilities

 

     As of
     June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
     (In thousands)

Employee deferred compensation plan

   $ 21,179    $ 20,478

Accrued sales representative commissions

     1,814      2,686

Accrued royalties

     486      4,385

Restructuring accrual

     6,282      10,095

Other current liabilities

     21,800      25,951
             

Total other current liabilities

   $ 51,561    $ 63,595
             

Deferred Income Taxes and Other Tax Liabilities

 

     As of
     June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
     (In thousands)

Deferred income taxes

   $ 1,744    $ 540

Non-current tax liabilities

     22,616      22,046
             

Total deferred income taxes and other tax liabilities

   $ 24,360    $ 22,586
             

NOTE 6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 28, 2009:

 

     Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total
     (In thousands)
Financial Assets            

Investments:

           

Commercial paper

   $ —      $ —      $ 615    $ 615

Money market funds

     135,146      —        —        135,146

Treasury bills

     6,111      —        —        6,111

Federal agency

     —        2,999      —        2,999

Corporate notes/bonds

     —        19,549      —        19,549

Auction rate securities

     —        —        33,967      33,967

Marketable equity securities

     5,066      —        —        5,066

Employee deferred compensation plan

     21,783      —        —        21,783

Derivative instruments:

           

Foreign currency forward contracts

     —        119      —        119
                           

Total financial assets

   $ 168,106    $ 22,667    $ 34,582    $ 225,355
                           
Financial Liabilities            

Employee deferred compensation plan

   $ 21,179    $ —      $ —      $ 21,179
                           

Total financial liabilities

   $ 21,179    $ —      $ —      $ 21,179
                           

 

15


Table of Contents

The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 28, 2008:

 

     Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total
     (In thousands)
Financial Assets            

Investments:

           

Commercial paper

   $ —      $ 4,992    $ 812    $ 5,804

Money market funds

     176,556      —        —        176,556

U.S. treasuries

     6,175      —        —        6,175

Corporate notes/bonds

     —        22,977      —        22,977

Auction rate securities

     —        —        34,890      34,890

Marketable equity securities

     4,452      —        —        4,452

Employee deferred compensation plan

     20,246      —        —        20,246

Derivative instruments:

           

Foreign currency forward contracts

     —        141      —        141
                           

Total financial assets

   $ 207,429    $ 28,110    $ 35,702    $ 271,241
                           
Financial Liabilities            

Employee deferred compensation plan

   $ 20,478    $ —      $ —      $ 20,478
                           

Total financial liabilities

   $ 20,478    $ —      $ —      $ 20,478
                           

Valuation Techniques:

We use quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets to determine the fair value for our Level 1 financial instruments, which include U.S. treasuries, money market funds and marketable equity securities. Our employee deferred compensation plan is classified as Level 1 as the plan invests in mutual funds, marketable equity securities and our common stock.

If quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities are not available to determine the fair value of our financial instruments, then we use observable inputs including benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The investments classified as Level 2 primarily consist of commercial paper (with the exception of one investment which is classified as Level 3) and corporate notes/bonds. In addition, we have derivative instruments that are classified as Level 2 financial assets. We determine the fair value of these instruments based on modeling techniques that include inputs such as market volatilities, spot rates and interest differentials from published sources.

Our Level 3 financial assets primarily include investments in auction rate securities and a commercial paper investment. The valuation techniques are described as follows:

Auction Rate Securities:

As of June 28, 2009, we have classified all of our auction rate securities as Level 3 financial instruments. Auction rate securities are investments with contractual maturities generally between 20 and 30 years. They are usually found in the form of municipal bonds, preferred stock, a pool of student loans or collateralized debt obligations with interest rates resetting every seven to 49 days through an auction process. At the end of each reset period, investors can sell or continue to hold the securities at par. The auction rate securities held by us are primarily backed by student loans and are over-collateralized, insured and guaranteed by the U.S. Federal Department of Education.

As of June 28, 2009, 95% of the auction rate securities held by us were rated as either AAA or Aaa and the remaining 5% of the securities were rated Baa3 or above by the major independent rating agencies.

As of June 28, 2009, all of our auction rate securities have experienced failed auctions due to sell orders exceeding buy orders. Currently, these failures are not believed to be a credit issue with the underlying investments, but rather caused by a lack of liquidity. Under the contractual terms, the issuer is obligated to pay penalty rates should an auction fail. The funds associated with failed auctions are not expected to be accessible until one of the following occurs: a successful auction occurs, the issuer redeems the issue, a buyer is found outside of the auction process or the underlying securities have matured. Given these circumstances and the lack of liquidity, we have classified our auction rate securities totaling $34.0 million as long-term investments as of June 28, 2009.

 

16


Table of Contents

We performed analyses to assess the fair value of our auction rate securities. In the absence of a liquid market to value these securities, we prepared a valuation model based on discounted cash flows. The assumptions used at June 28, 2009 were as follows:

 

   

7 years to liquidity;

 

   

continued receipt of contractual interest which provides a premium spread for failed auctions; and

 

   

discount rates of 3.0% - 6.1%, which incorporates a spread for both credit and liquidity risk.

Based on these assumptions, we estimated that the auction rate securities should be valued at approximately 88% of their stated par value as of June 28, 2009. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009 we determined that the decline in value was other-than-temporary and we recorded an impairment charge of $1.4 million. No impairment charges were recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. We do not believe that the lack of liquidity of our auction rate securities will have a material impact on our overall ability to meet our cash requirements for the foreseeable future.

Commercial Paper:

As of June 28, 2009, we have classified one commercial paper investment totaling $0.6 million as a Level 3 financial asset. The investment was issued through a structured investment vehicle that was impaired as the issuer was unable to raise sufficient funding to cover maturing obligations.

The following table presents a summary of changes in our Level 3 investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 28, 2009:

 

     Auction Rate
Securities
    Commercial
Paper
    Total  
     (In thousands)  

Balance as of December 28, 2008

   $ 34,890      $ 812      $ 35,702   

Unrealized gain

     201        —          201   

Impairment loss recorded in “Other income (expense), net”

     (1,393     (197     (1,590
                        

Balance as of March 29, 2009

     33,698        615        34,313   

Unrealized gain

     269        —          269   
                        

Balance as of June 28, 2009

   $ 33,967      $ 615      $ 34,582   
                        

The following table presents a summary of changes in our Level 3 investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 29, 2008:

 

     Auction Rate
Securities
    Commercial
Paper
    Total  
     (In thousands)  

Balance as of December 30, 2007

   $ —        $ 1,065      $ 1,065   

Transfer from Level 2

     38,749        —          38,749   

Impairment loss recorded in “Other income (expense), net”

     —          (112     (112

Unrealized loss recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income”

     (1,392     —          (1,392
                        

Balance as of March 30, 2008

   $ 37,357      $ 953      $ 38,310   

Impairment loss recorded in “Other income (expense), net”

     —          (141     (141

Unrealized gain recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income”

     570        —          570   
                        

Balance as of June 29, 2008

   $ 37,927      $ 812      $ 38,739   
                        

 

17


Table of Contents

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

The following table presents our fair value hierarchy for our investments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the impairment loss related to these investments:

 

     Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total as of
June 28,

2009
   Impairment Loss Recorded in
“Other Income (Expense), Net”
 
                 Three Months
Ended
June 28,
2009
   Three Months
Ended
June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Non-marketable equity securities

   $ —      $ —      $ 1,227    $ 1,227    $ —      $ (4,114 )
                                           

 

18


Table of Contents

We measure our equity investments in privately held companies at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The balance of the investments was $1.2 million as of June 28, 2009. These investments are measured at fair value when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. We measured the fair value of such investments using a combination of the income approach and the market approach. The income approach included a discounted cash flow analysis, which required the use of unobservable inputs, including assumptions of projected revenues, expenses, capital spending and other costs, as well as a discount rate calculated based on the risk profile of the investees. The market approach included using financial metrics and ratios of comparable public companies. All of our impaired non-marketable equity investments were classified as Level 3 instruments, as we use unobservable inputs to value these investments and the valuation requires significant management judgment. The valuation of our non-marketable equity investments also takes into account the movements of the equity and venture capital markets, recent financing activities by the investees, changes in the interest rate environment, the investees’ capital structure, liquidation preferences for the investees’ capital, and other economic variables.

NOTE 7. INVESTMENTS

Available-For-Sale Securities

The following tables summarize our available-for-sale investments:

 

As of June 28, 2009

   Cost    Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
     (In thousands)

Cash equivalents:

          

Money market funds

   $ 135,146    $ —      $ —        $ 135,146
                            

Total cash equivalents

     135,146      —        —          135,146
                            

Short-term investments:

          

U.S. treasuries

     5,991      120      —          6,111

Federal Agency

     2,978      21      —          2,999

Corporate notes/bonds

     19,072      497      (20     19,549

Marketable equity securities

     1,053      3,088      —          4,141
                            

Total short-term investments

     29,094      3,726      (20     32,800
                            

Long-term investments:

          

Auction rate securities

     38,749      595      (5,377     33,967

Commercial paper

     615      —        —          615

Marketable equity securities

     1,187      —        (262     925
                            

Total long-term investments

     40,551      595      (5,639     35,507
                            

Total available-for-sale securities

   $ 204,791    $ 4,321    $ (5,659   $ 203,453
                            

As of December 28, 2008

   Cost    Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
     (In thousands)

Cash equivalents:

          

Commercial paper

   $ 4,992    $ —      $ —        $ 4,992

Money market funds

     176,556      —        —          176,556
                            

Total cash equivalents

     181,548      —        —          181,548
                            

Short-term investments:

          

U.S. treasuries

     5,998      177      —          6,175

Corporate notes/bonds

     23,057      41      (121     22,977

Marketable equity securities

     1,188      2,703      —          3,891
                            

Total short-term investments

     30,243      2,921      (121     33,043
                            

Long-term investments:

          

Auction rate securities

     34,890      —        —          34,890

Commercial paper

     812      —        —          812

Marketable equity securities

     1,187      —        (626     561
                            

Total long-term investments

     36,889      —        (626     36,263
                            

Total available-for-sale securities

   $ 248,680    $ 2,921    $ (747   $ 250,854
                            

 

19


Table of Contents

Currently, the available-for-sale debt investments that we hold are all high investment grade. The unrealized losses on our investments were due primarily to changes in interest rates and market conditions of the underlying securities. Because we do not intend to sell and it is likely we will not be required to sell before recovering our cost, which may be maturity, except for the impairment recorded in the respective periods, we did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008.

For individual marketable equity securities with unrealized losses, we evaluated the near-term prospects in relation to the severity and duration of the impairment. Based on that evaluation and our ability and intent to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time, we did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008.

As of June 28, 2009, contractual maturities of our available-for-sale, non-equity investments were as follows:

 

     Cost    Fair Value
     (In thousands)

Maturing within one year

   $ 141,834    $ 142,436

Maturing in one to three years

     21,354      21,369

Maturing in more than three years

     34,111      34,582
             

Total

   $ 197,299    $ 198,387
             

Realized gains and losses from sales of available-for-sale, non-equity investments were immaterial for all periods presented.

Proceeds from sales or maturities of available-for-sale investments were $20.8 million and $169.1 million for the six months ended June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008, respectively.

Investments in Equity Securities

The following table summarizes our equity investments:

 

     As of
     June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
     (In thousands)

Short-term investments:

     

Marketable equity securities

   $ 4,141    $ 3,891

Long-term investments:

     

Marketable equity securities

     925      561

Non-marketable equity securities

     1,227      1,227
             

Total long-term investments

     2,152      1,788
             

Total equity investments

   $ 6,293    $ 5,679
             

Sale of Equity Investments:

We did not sell any equity investments during any of the fiscal periods presented.

Impairment of Investments

The following table summarizes the impairment loss recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Debt Securities:

         

Commercial paper

   $ —      $ (141   $ (197   $ (253

Auction rate securities

     —        —          (1,393     —     

Corporate bonds

     —        —          (141     —     

Equity securities:

         

Non-marketable equity securities

     —        (4,114     —          (4,114

Marketable equity securities

     —        —          —          (101
                               

Total impairment loss

   $     —      $ (4,255   $ (1,731   $ (4,468
                               

 

20


Table of Contents

Employee Deferred Compensation Plan

We have a deferred compensation plan, which provides certain key employees, including our executive management, with the ability to defer the receipt of compensation in order to accumulate funds for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. We do not make contributions to the deferred compensation plan or guarantee returns on the investments. Participant deferrals and investment gains and losses remain with us and the assets are subject to claims of general creditors.

We account for the deferred compensation plan in accordance with EITF Issue No. 97-14, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation Arrangements Where Amounts Earned Are Held in a Rabbi Trust and Invested.” In accordance with EITF Issue No. 97-14, the assets are recorded at fair value in each reporting period with the offset being recorded in “Other income (expense), net.” The liabilities are recorded at fair value in each reporting period with the offset being recorded as an operating expense or income. As of June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008, the fair value of the assets was $21.8 million and $20.2 million, respectively, and the fair value of the liabilities were $21.2 million and $20.5 million, respectively.

All non-cash expense and income recorded under the deferred compensation plan were included in the following line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Changes in fair value of assets recorded in:

        

Other expense, net

   $ 2,310      $ 60      $ 1,636      $ (2,476

Changes in fair value of liabilities recorded in:

        

Cost of revenues

     (252     (19     (190     923   

Research and development expenses

     (749     (21     (654     1,065   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     (1,572     (16     (1,080     808   
                                

Total income (expense)

   $ (263   $ 4      $ (288   $ 320   
                                

NOTE 8. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Modification of Outstanding Employee Equity Awards

As discussed in Note 2, in fiscal 2008, the Board in conjunction with the Spin-Off, approved certain adjustments to our 1994 and 1999 Stock Plans (together, the “Plans”). Specifically, the Board approved amendments to make proportionate adjustments to, among other things, outstanding employee equity awards, including stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards, under the Plans to preserve the intrinsic value of the awards before and after the Spin-Off. These changes included a proportionate adjustment in the number of shares issuable pursuant to the outstanding awards and the per-share exercise price of the options.

The Board also approved certain adjustments with respect to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) to offset the decrease in our common stock price resulting from the Spin-Off. These changes included a proportionate adjustment in the offering date price per share of our common stock and maximum number of shares participants may purchase under the ESPP.

In accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” the modification of the outstanding employee equity awards and the ESPP resulted in additional non-cash stock-based compensation. The amount was measured based upon the difference between the fair value of the awards immediately before and after the modification. Of the total additional non-cash stock-based compensation, $17.8 million was recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and the remaining $46.5 million will be recognized over the remaining vesting periods on an accelerated basis pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 28, “Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans.”

 

21


Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the stock-based compensation expense, including the expense related to the modification discussed above, by line item recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

     Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
     June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
   June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
     (In thousands)

Cost of revenues

   $ 11,189    $ 4,563    $ 25,466    $ 8,180

Research and development

     10,746      5,190      23,358      10,101

Selling, general and administrative

     15,744      9,421      37,099      17,082
                           

Total stock-based compensation expense

   $ 37,679    $ 19,174    $ 85,923    $ 35,363
                           

Consolidated cash proceeds from the issuance of shares under the employee stock plans were approximately $43.6 million for the six months ended June 28, 2009 and $15.4 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008. We did not recognize a benefit from stock option exercises in the six months ended June 28, 2009 or June 29, 2008.

As of June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008, stock-based compensation capitalized in inventories totaled $7.0 million and $6.2 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense by type of award:

 

     Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
     June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
   June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
     (In thousands)

Stock options

   $ 17,396    $ 5,398    $ 35,556    $ 11,890

Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards

     18,192      11,710      43,383      19,957

ESPP

     2,091      2,066      6,984      3,516
                           

Total stock-based compensation expense

   $ 37,679    $ 19,174    $ 85,923    $ 35,363
                           

The following table summarizes the unrecognized stock-based compensation balance by type of award at June 28, 2009:

 

           Weighted-Average
Amortization
Period
     (In thousands)   (In years)

Stock options

   $ 67,205   2.03

Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards

     62,430   2.78

ESPP

     5,001   0.53
        

Total unrecognized stock-based compensation balance

   $ 134,636   2.32
        

Valuation Assumptions

We estimated the fair value of the stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions:

 

     Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
     June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
   June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008

Expected life

           

Volatility

   2.4 - 7.1 years    1.5 - 6.5 years    2.4 - 7.4 years    1.5 - 8.4 years

Risk-free interest rate

   50.4% - 54.9%    47.5% - 53.4%    50.4% - 60.8%    47.5% - 54.6%

Dividend yield

   0.92% - 3.06%    2.99% - 3.78%    0.90% - 3.06%    1.40% - 3.78%

The fair value of the restricted stock units and the restricted stock awards was based on our stock price on the date of grant.

Equity Incentive Program Related to Cypress’s Common Stock

As of June 28, 2009, approximately 14.4 million stock options or 7.6 million restricted stock units and restricted stock awards were available for grant under the Amended 1994 Stock Plan, and no stock options were available for grant under the 1999 Stock Option Plan as the plan expired in March 2009.

 

22


Table of Contents

Stock Options:

The following table summarizes our stock option activities:

 

     Shares     Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
    

(In thousands, except

per- share amount)

Options outstanding as of December 28, 2008

   70,273      $4.43

Granted

   5,252      $6.08

Exercised

   (3,109   $3.54

Forfeited or expired

   (1,910   $5.00
        

Options outstanding as of March 29, 2009

   70,506      $4.57

Granted

   193      $7.75

Exercised

   (6,258   $4.09

Forfeited or expired

   (1,088   $5.86
        

Options outstanding as of June 28, 2009

   63,353      $4.61
        

Options exercisable as of June 28, 2009

   38,046      $4.19
        

Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards:

The following table summarizes our restricted stock unit and restricted stock award activities:

 

     Shares     Weighted-Average
Fair Value
per Share
    

(In thousands, except

per- share amounts)

Balance as of December 28, 2008

   28,745      $5.78

Granted

   501      $5.64

Vested

   (2,929   $5.88

Forfeited

   (3,649   $5.30
        

Balance as of March 29, 2009

   22,668      $5.84

Granted

   808      $7.86

Vested

   (920   $7.99

Forfeited

   (801   $6.30
        

Balance as of June 28, 2009

   21,755      $5.81
        

The balance as of June 28, 2009 included approximately 13.2 million performance-based restricted stock units and restricted stock awards granted under the Amended 1994 Stock Plan. The awards were issued to certain senior-level employees of Cypress and can be earned ratably over two to three years.

On March 12, 2009, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) approved the performance milestone achievements for 2008. The Committee, in its review of the performance achievements under 2008 PARS and other factors, exercised its discretion under our 1994 Stock Plan and adjusted the calculation methodology for certain performance milestones under the 2008 PARS. The adjusted methodology allowed us to calculate performance achievements based on financial operational results for the first three fiscal quarters of 2008 with respect to 75% of the participants targeted PARS, and the performance calculations for the remaining 25% targeted PARS to be based on financial and operations results of the fourth quarter of 2008. The targeted gross margins for the fourth fiscal quarter of 2008 were adjusted to account for product mix and under loading of the our manufacturing facilities as we proactively took steps to manage down inventory in a rapidly declining market. In exercising its discretion, the Committee considered the sharp global economic downturn which hit heavily in the fourth quarter of 2008; a sharp downturn not foreseen in industry forecasts or the Cypress plan for 2008. The Committee also factored in the impact of the final separation of SunPower, a major project and point of discontinuity in the operations of the company, as part of the basis for the exercise of its discretion. As a result we recorded additional stock-based compensation of approximately $11.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

        During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Committee established the milestones for the first half of fiscal 2009 for approximately 2.3 million of the outstanding performance-based awards. These performance-based milestones include the achievement of certain performance results of our common stock appreciation target against the Philadelphia Semiconductor Sector Index (“SOXX”), certain levels of non-GAAP free cash flows and certain levels of non-GAAP operating expense. These awards are earned upon the Committee’s certification that the specified market and/or performance milestones have been achieved. If the milestones are not achieved, the shares are forfeited and cannot be earned in future periods.

 

23


Table of Contents

The fair value of the shares with the market-condition milestone was determined using a Monte Carlo valuation methodology with the following weighted-average assumptions: volatility of our common stock of 69.6%; volatility of the SOXX of 57.4%; correlation coefficient of 0.69; and risk-free interest rate of 0.3%. The fair value of the shares with the performance-related milestones was equivalent to the grant-date fair value of our common stock.

On August 6, 2009, the Committee approved the performance milestones for the first half of 2009 which will result in the release of 2.1 million shares of performance-based restricted stock units and restricted stock awards, prior to required tax payments. In addition on August 6, 2009, the Committee set three performance milestones required for the second half of fiscal 2009 for approximately 2.3 million of the outstanding performance-based awards currently set to be achieved by the end of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2009. These performance-based milestones include the achievement of certain performance results of our common stock appreciation target against the SOXX, certain levels of non-GAAP gross margin percentage and certain levels of non-GAAP operating income for the performance period. These milestones are adjusted for any non-planned, one-time and unusual transactions as designated by the Committee. These awards are earned upon the Committee’s certification that the specified market and/or performance milestones have been achieved. If the milestones are not achieved, the shares are forfeited and cannot be earned in future periods.

NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Guarantees

During fiscal 2005, we entered into a strategic foundry partnership with Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (“Grace”), pursuant to which we have transferred certain of our proprietary process technologies to Grace’s Shanghai, China facility. In accordance with a foundry agreement executed in fiscal 2006, we purchase wafers from Grace that are produced using these process technologies.

Pursuant to a master lease agreement, Grace has leased certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment from a financing company. In conjunction with the master lease agreement, we have entered into a series of guarantees with the financing company for the benefit of Grace. Under the guarantees, we have agreed to unconditional guarantees to the financing company of the rental payments payable by Grace for the leased equipment under the master lease agreement. If Grace fails to pay any of the quarterly rental payments, we will be obligated to pay such outstanding amounts within 10 days of a written demand from the financing company. If we fail to pay such amount, interest will accrue at a rate of 9% per annum on any unpaid amounts. To date, we have not been required to make any payments under these guarantees. As of June 2009 we updated our assessment of the likelihood that we would have to settle the outstanding lease payments and we determined that is was not probable. As a result we have not recorded any liability relating to outstanding lease payments.

Pursuant to the guarantees, we issued irrevocable letters of credit to secure the rental payments under the guarantees in the event a demand is made by the financing company on us. The amount available under the letters of credit will decline according to schedules mutually agreed upon by us and the financing company. If we default, the financing company will be entitled to draw on the letters of credit. In connection with the guarantees, we were granted options to purchase ordinary shares of Grace. As of June 28, 2009, we determined that the fair value of the guarantees and the options was not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes the terms and status of the guarantees:

 

Fiscal Year

   Number of
Guarantees
   Lease Term
of Equipment
Under Each
Guarantee
   Outstanding Rental Payments    Outstanding Irrevocable Letters of
Credits
   Grace
Options
Granted
to Cypress
         At Inception    As of    At Inception    As of   
            June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
      June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
  
                         (In thousands)               

2006

   One    36 months    $ 8,255    $ 1,376    $ 2,752    $ 6,392    $ 1,697    $ 2,829    2,272

2007

   Five    36 months      42,278      14,781      21,828      32,726      14,999      20,793    26,924

2008

   One    36 months      10,372      6,050      7,778      7,918      5,608      7,010    11,684
                                                    
         $ 60,905    $ 22,207    $ 32,358    $ 47,036    $ 22,304    $ 30,632    40,880
                                                    

Product Warranties

We generally warrant our products against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one year and that product warranty is generally limited to a refund of the original purchase price of the product or a replacement part. We estimate our warranty costs based on historical warranty claim experience. Warranty returns are included in the allowance for sales returns. The allowance for sales returns is reviewed quarterly to verify that it properly reflects the remaining obligations based on the anticipated returns over the balance of the obligation period.

 

24


Table of Contents

The following table presents our warranty activities, including amounts recorded in the allowance for sales returns:

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
    June 29
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Beginning balance

   $ 4,258      $ 2,613      $ 3,341      $ 3,074   

Settlements

     (3,475     (1,813     (5,354     (3,289

Provisions

     2,722        1,793        5,518        2,808   
                                

Ending balance

   $ 3,505      $ 2,593      $ 3,505      $ 2,593   
                                

Litigation and Asserted Claims

In April 2008, we, along with several other companies, were named in an International Trade Commission (“ITC”) action filed by Agere/LSI Corporation (“LSI”), which alleges infringement of Agere/LSI’s patent no. 5,227,335. Agere/LSI filed the same patent infringement claim concurrently in the federal district court in Marshall, Texas. On March 27, 2009, we signed a settlement and patent license agreement with LSI. This agreement settled all current and past claims and the settlement did not result in a material impact to our results of operations.

 

25


Table of Contents

In connection with the DOJ’s investigation of the SRAM market (which the DOJ concluded in December 2008 and which did not result in any allegation or charge against the Company), in October 2006, we, along with a majority of the other SRAM manufacturers, were named in numerous consumer class action suits that have now been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The cases variously allege claims under the Sherman Antitrust Act and various state antitrust laws. The lawsuits seek restitution, injunction and damages in an unspecified amount. The parties are engaged in the discovery and the class certification process. We were also named in purported consumer antitrust class action suits in three provinces of Canada. We believe we have meritorious defenses to these allegations and will vigorously defend ourselves in these matters.

We, along with several other co-defendants, are party to trade secret misappropriation litigation filed by Silvaco Data Systems in the Santa Clara Superior Court in May 2004. On February 10, 2009, summary judgment was granted in our favor in this matter Silvaco has appealed our victory as it has with the other co-defendants. As of the date of this filing, the parties are awaiting a hearing date from the Court of Appeals. We believe we have meritorious defenses to these allegations and will vigorously defend ourselves in these matters.

We are currently a party to various other legal proceedings, claims, disputes and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on the our own investigations, we believe the ultimate outcome of our current legal proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operation or cash flows. However, because of the nature and inherent uncertainties of the litigation, should the outcome of these actions be unfavorable, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

NOTE 10. DEBT AND EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

1.00% Convertible Senior Notes (“1.00% Notes”)

The following table summarizes the outstanding principal amount of the 1.00% Notes:

 

     As of
     June 28, 2009    December 28, 2008
     Carrying Value    Fair Value    Carrying Value    Fair Value
     (In thousands)

1.00% Notes

   $ 27,726    $ 46,968    $ 27,023    $ 27,999

The fair value of the convertible debt was determined based on quoted market prices.

1.00% Notes:

The principal amount of the 1.00% Notes has interest payable semiannually in arrears in cash on March 15 and September 15 of each year and beginning on September 15, 2007. The 1.00% Notes will mature on September 15, 2009 unless earlier repurchased or converted. The 1.00% Notes are initially convertible, subject to certain conditions, into cash up to the lesser of the principal amount or the conversion value. If the conversion value is greater than $1,000, then the excess conversion value will be convertible into cash, common stock or a combination of cash and common stock, at our election. The initial effective conversion price of the 1.00% Notes was $23.90 per share, which represented a premium of 26.5% to the closing price of our common stock on the date of issuance. As a result of the Spin-Off the post-spin conversion price was adjusted to be $5.64 per share. Holders who convert their 1.00% Notes in connection with certain types of corporate transactions constituting a fundamental change may be entitled to a make-whole premium in the form of an increase in the conversion rate. Additionally, in the event of a fundamental change as described in the agreement, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their 1.00% Notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the fundamental change repurchase date.

The 1.00% Notes are unsubordinated and unsecured senior obligations of Cypress, and rank equal in right of payment with all of our other existing and future unsubordinated and unsecured obligations, rank junior in right of payment to any of our secured obligations to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such obligations, and are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future obligations of our subsidiaries.

We did not enter into any share lending agreements relating to the 1.00% Notes with any third parties.

 

26


Table of Contents

Holders may freely convert the 1.00% Notes on or after June 15, 2009 until the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date. Prior to June 15, 2009, holders could convert their 1.00% Notes if for 20 trading days within the last 30 trading days of the immediately preceding quarter, our common stock closes at a price in excess of 130% of the conversion price in effect on the last day of such calendar quarter.

Convertible Note Hedge and Warrants:

In connection with the issuance of the 1.00% Notes, we entered into a convertible note hedge transaction with respect to our common stock with the option counterparties (Credit Suisse International and Deutsche Bank AG) covering the same amount of common stock that is issuable upon conversion of the 1.00% Notes in order to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the 1.00% Notes in the event that the market value per share of our common stock at the time of exercise is greater than the conversion price of the 1.00% Notes. In addition, we entered into a warrant transaction in which we sold to the option counterparties warrants to acquire the same number of shares of our common stock underlying the 1.00% Notes. The portion of the convertible note hedge and the warrants associated with the outstanding principal amount of the 1.00% Notes remain outstanding as of June 28, 2009.

Impact of the adoption of FSP APB 14-1:

Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of FSP APB 14-1, which applies to certain convertible debt instruments that have a “net settlement feature”, which means instruments that by their terms may be settled either wholly or partially in cash upon conversion. Under FSP APB 14-1, the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly or partially in cash upon conversion must be accounted for separately in a manner reflective of our nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. Since our 1.00% Notes and our 1.25% convertible subordinated notes (“1.25% Notes” were issued in 2003 which we redeemed in February 2007), have or had an equity component that can or could be settled in cash or equity, both debt instruments qualified for treatment under this new accounting standard.

Our effective borrowing rate for nonconvertible debt at the time of issuance of the 1.00% Notes was estimated to be 6.15% and for our 1.25% Notes it was estimated to be 6.20%. For the 1.00% Notes this resulted in $70.6 million of the $600 million aggregate principal amount of debentures issued being attributable to equity. For the 1.25% Notes this resulted in $126.0 million of the $600 million aggregate principal amount of debentures issued being attributable to equity.

The cumulative effect as of December 29, 2008 (the first day of fiscal 2009) of the change in accounting principle was a decrease to convertible debt of approximately $1.0 million for the discount on the 1.00% Notes, a decrease to additional paid-in capital of approximately $43.4 million, a decrease to accumulated deficit of approximately $44.5 million and an increase to debt issuance cost of approximately $0.1 million. As a result of the change in the accounting principle, the cumulative effect of the higher interest cost from both our 1.00% and 1.25% Notes is being offset by the losses on our extinguishment of debt which are now being recorded to equity.

Our adoption resulted in $0.8 million and $14.6 million higher in interest and other expense for the first half of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of December 28, 2008, there was $1.0 million of the initial $70.6 million debt discount (1.00% Notes) which remained unamortized, and is expected to be amortized through September 2009. As of June 28, 2009, the aggregate carrying value of the remaining debt, including the unamortized discount, was $27.7 million. The tax effect of our adoption was immaterial to our financial statements. The following table summarizes the effects of FSP APB 14-1’s on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months and six months ended June 29, 2008 and on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six month ended June 29, 2008:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 29, 2008
(In thousands)
 
     As Originally
Reported
    As
Adjusted
    Effect of
Change in
Accounting
Principle
 

Interest expense

   $ (1,506   $ (9,656   $ (8,150

Other income (expense), net

     (2,451     (2,451     —     

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     7,432        (718     (8,150

Income from discontinued operations

     15,974        17,399        1,425   

Net income (loss)

   $ 23,406      $ 16,681      $ (6,725

Net income (loss) per share—basic:

      

Continuing operations

   $ 0.05      $ (0.01 )   $ (0.06

Discontinued operations

     0.11        0.12        0.01   
                        

Net income (loss) per share—basic

   $ 0.16      $ 0.11      $ (0.05
                        

Net income (loss) per share—diluted:

      

Continuing operations

   $ 0.04      $ (0.01 )   $ (0.05

Discontinued operations

     0.10        0.11        0.01   
                        

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

   $ 0.14      $ 0.10      $ (0.04
                        

 

27


Table of Contents
     Six Months Ended
June 29, 2008
(In thousands)
 
     As Originally
Reported
    As
Adjusted
    Effect of
Change in
Accounting
Principle
 

Interest expense

   $ (3,011   $ (19,218   $ (16,207

Other income (expense), net

     (6,312     (4,754     1,558   

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     (16,118     (30,767     (14,649

Income from discontinued operations

     23,215        24,364        1,149   

Net income (loss)

   $ 7,097      $ (6,403   $ (13,500

Net income (loss) per share—basic:

      

Continuing operations

   $ (0.11   $ (0.20   $ (0.09

Discontinued operations

     0.15        0.16        0.01   
                        

Net income (loss) per share—basic

   $ 0.04      $ (0.04   $ (0.08
                        

Net income (loss) per share—diluted:

      

Continuing operations

   $ (0.11   $ (0.20   $ (0.09

Discontinued operations

     0.15        0.16        0.01   
                        

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

   $ 0.04      $ (0.04   $ (0.08
                        
     Six Months Ended
June 29, 2008
(In thousands)
 
     As Originally
Reported
    As
Adjusted
    Effect of
Change in
Accounting
Principle
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

      

Net income (loss)

   $ 7,097      $ (6,403   $ (13,500

Less: income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

     23,215        24,364        1,149   

Loss from continuing operations

     (16,118     (30,767     (14,649

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

      

Non cash interest expense and other non cash expense on adoption of APB 14-1

     —          14,649        14,649   

Net cash provided by operating activities—continuing operations

     49,159        49,159        —     

Net cash used in operating activities—discontinued operations

     (39,371     (39,371     —     

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 9,788      $ 9,788      $ —     

Line of Credit

In March 2009, we extended our line of credit with Silicon Valley Bank to March 2010 with a total available amount of $55.0 million. Loans made under the line of credit bear interest based upon the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (3.25% as of June 28, 2009) or LIBOR plus 2.5% (3.1% as of June 28, 2009). The line of credit agreement includes a variety of covenants including restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness, incurrence of loans, the payment of dividends or distribution on our capital stock, and transfers of assets and financial covenants with respect to an adjusted quick ratio and tangible net worth. As of June 28, 2009, we were in compliance with all of the financial covenants. Our obligations under the line of credit are guaranteed and collateralized by the common stock of certain of our business entities. We intend to use the line of credit on an as-needed basis to fund working capital and capital expenditures. To date, there have been no borrowings under the line of credit.

 

28


Table of Contents

In conjunction with certain guarantees, we issued irrevocable standby letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $47.0 million to secure payments under an equipment lease. As of June 28, 2009, the letters of credit have been reduced to $22.3 million. See “Lease Guarantees” under Note 9 for further discussion.

Stock Repurchase Program

During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, our Board of Directors approved an additional $300.0 million under the stock repurchase program, bringing the total amount that may be used for stock purchases to $600.0 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we used $6.5 million to repurchase approximately 1.4 million shares at an average share price of $4.59. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we used $4.7 million to repurchase approximately 0.7 million shares at an average share price of $6.82. As of June 28, 2009, the remaining balance available for future stock repurchases was $213.2 million under the stock repurchase program.

NOTE 11. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income and loss were as follows:

 

     As of
     June 28,
2009
    December 28,
2008
     (In thousands)

Accumulated net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments

   $ 4,017      $ 2,427

Accumulated net unrealized gain on derivatives

     —          106

Other-than-temporary impairment of auction rate securities

     (5,253     —  
              

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (1,236   $ 2,533
              

The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, were as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Net income (loss)

   $ (45,285   $ 16,681      $ (133,620   $ (6,403

Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments

     1,581        (2,220     1,590        (3,211

Net unrealized gains on derivatives

     (54     (53     (106     (106

Impairment of auction rate securities

     (5,253     —          (5,253     —     
                                

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (49,011   $ 14,408      $ (137,389   $ (9,720
                                

NOTE 12. FOREIGN CURRENCY DERIVATIVES

We operate and sell products in various global markets and purchase capital equipment using foreign currencies. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We may use various hedge instruments from time to time to manage the exposures associated with purchases of foreign sourced equipment, net asset or liability positions of its subsidiaries and forecasted revenues and expenses. We do not enter into foreign currency derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The counterparties to these hedging transactions are creditworthy multinational banks and the risk of counterparty nonperformance associated with these contracts is not considered to be material as of June 28, 2009.

As of June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008, our hedge instruments consisted primarily of foreign currency forward contracts. We estimate the fair value of our forward contracts based on spot and forward rates from published sources.

We record hedges of certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities at fair value at the end of each reporting period with the related gains or losses recorded in “Other income (expense), net” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The gains or losses on these contracts are substantially offset by transaction gains or losses on the underlying balances being hedged. As of June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008, we had outstanding forward contracts with an aggregate notional value of $2.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively, to hedge the risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.

 

29


Table of Contents

NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES

Our income tax expense was $1.3 million on loss before tax of $44.0 million for the three months ended June 28, 2009 and income tax benefit was $14.3 million on loss before tax of $15.0 million for the three months ended June 29, 2008. Our income tax expense was $3.9 million for the six months ended June 28, 2009 and income tax benefit was $12.0 million for the six months ended June 28, 2008. The tax provision for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009 was primarily attributable to non-U.S. taxes on income earned in foreign jurisdictions. The tax benefit for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 was primarily attributable to a change in an estimate of potential withholding tax liability in a foreign jurisdiction including accrued interest, which resulted in the recognition of $14.1 million in tax benefits, a release of previously accrued taxes and interest of $7.3 million due to the resolution of the U.S. income tax examination, and the amortization of a deferred tax liability associated with purchased intangible assets. The tax benefit for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 was partially offset by non-U.S. taxes on income earned in foreign jurisdictions and tax accruals (primarily alternative minimum tax) of $5.5 million from a resolution of the U.S. income tax examination for the tax years 2003 and 2004.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

As of June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008, the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet that, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate totaled approximately $21.1 million and $20.4 million, respectively.

Management believes events that could occur in the next 12 months and cause a material change in unrecognized tax benefits include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

   

completion of examinations by foreign taxing authorities; and

 

   

expiration of statute of limitations on our tax returns.

The calculation of unrecognized tax benefits involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex global tax regulations. Management regularly assesses our tax positions in light of legislative, bilateral tax treaty, regulatory and judicial developments in the countries in which we do business.

Classification of Interest and Penalties

Our policy is to classify interest expense and penalty, if any, as components of income tax provision in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 28, 2009 and December 28, 2008, accrued interest and penalties totaled $5.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively.

Spin-Off of SunPower

We and SunPower have entered into a tax sharing agreement providing for each of the parties’ obligations concerning various tax liabilities. The tax sharing agreement is structured such that we will pay all federal, state, local and foreign taxes that are calculated on a consolidated or combined basis (as defined under applicable federal, state or foreign law) reduced by SunPower’s portion of such tax liability or benefit determined based upon its separate return tax liability as defined under the tax sharing agreement. Such liability or benefit will be based on a pro forma calculation as if SunPower were filing a separate income tax return in each jurisdiction, rather than on a combined or consolidated basis with us subject to adjustments as set forth in the tax sharing agreement.

SunPower ceased to be a member of our (1) consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and most state income tax purposes (in those states which require or allow the filing of a consolidated state income tax return based upon U.S. federal consolidation rules), as of June 6, 2006, and (2) remaining state combined group for state income tax purposes, as of September 29, 2008 (the date of the Spin-Off). To the extent that SunPower becomes entitled to utilize on its separate tax returns portions of those credit or loss carryforwards existing as of such dates, SunPower will pay us the tax effect, measured at 35% for federal income tax purposes, of the amount of such tax loss carryforwards so utilized, and the amount of any credit carryforwards so utilized. SunPower will pay these amounts us in cash or in SunPower’s shares, at SunPower’s option. As of June 28, 2009, SunPower has $44.0 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards and $5.0 million of federal and state tax credits subject to payment to us under the tax sharing agreement amounting to approximately $20.4 million. Of this total amount, it is reasonably anticipated that we will receive from SunPower $16.6 million within the next 6 months. Accordingly, we have recorded a receivable from SunPower in the amount of $16.6 million which is included in other current assets with a corresponding increase to additional paid in capital.

In connection with the Spin-Off (see Note 2), Cypress and SunPower entered into an amendment to the existing tax sharing agreement between the parties to address certain transactions that may affect the tax treatment of the Spin-Off and certain other matters. Under the amended tax sharing agreement, SunPower is required to provide notice to us of certain transactions that could give rise to SunPower’s indemnification obligation relating to taxes resulting from the application of Section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code or similar provision of other applicable law to the Spin-Off as a result of one or more acquisitions (within the meaning of Section 355(e)) of SunPower’s stock after the Spin-Off.

 

30


Table of Contents

In addition, under the amended tax sharing agreement and subject to certain exceptions, SunPower agreed that, for a period of 25 months following the Spin-Off, it will not: (a) effect a transaction that would result in a recapitalization as defined by the parties (“Recapitalization”) or (b) enter into or facilitate any other transaction resulting in an acquisition (within the meaning of Section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code) of SunPower’s stock without first obtaining our written consent. SunPower further agreed that it will not: (a) effect a Recapitalization during the 36 month period following the Spin-Off without first obtaining a tax opinion to the effect that such Recapitalization (either alone or when taken together with any other transaction or transactions) will not cause the Spin-Off to become taxable under Section 355(e), or (b) seek any private ruling, including any supplemental private ruling, from the IRS with regard to the Spin-Off, or any transaction having any bearing on the tax treatment of the Spin-Off, without our prior written consent.

NOTE 14. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands, except per-share amounts)  

Net income (loss) basic and diluted:

        

Loss from continuing operations

   $ (45,285   $ (718   $ (133,620   $ (30,767

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

     —          17,399        —          24,364   
                                

Net income (loss)

   $ (45,285   $ 16,681      $ (133,620   $ (6,403
                                

Weighted-average common shares

     141,107        150,675        137,932        152,818   

Weighted-average diluted shares

     141,107        161,732        137,932        152,818   

Net income (loss) per share—basic:

        

Continuing operations

   $ (0.32   $ (0.01   $ (0.97   $ (0.20

Discontinued operations

     —          0.12        —          0.16   
                                

Basic net income (loss) per share

   $ (0.32   $ 0.11      $ (0.97   $ (0.04
                                

Net income (loss) per share—diluted:

        

Continuing operations

   $ (0.32   $ (0.01   $ (0.97   $ (0.20

Discontinued operations

     —          0.11        —          0.16   
                                

Diluted net income (loss) per share

   $ (0.32   $ 0.10      $ (0.97   $ (0.04
                                

The following anti-dilutive securities were excluded from the diluted calculation:

 

     Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
     June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
   June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
     (In thousands)

Stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards

   88,638    2,991    92,266    10,431

Convertible debt

   1,442    —      721    1,595

Warrants

   987    —      493    174

Convertible Debt:

The 1.00% Notes are convertible debt which requires us to settle the principal value of the debt in cash and any conversion premiums in either cash or stock, at our election. In connection with the issuance of the 1.00% Notes, we entered into a convertible note hedge transaction with respect to our common stock with the option counterparties covering the same amount of common stock

 

31


Table of Contents

that is issuable upon conversion of the 1.00% Notes in order to reduce the potential dilution in the event that the market value per share of our common stock at the time of exercise is greater than the conversion price of the 1.00% Notes. In addition, we entered into a warrant transaction in which we sold to the option counterparties warrants to acquire the same number of shares of our common stock underlying the 1.00% Notes. We applied the treasury stock method in determining the dilutive impact of both the 1.00% Notes and the warrants. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” the convertible note hedge is excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation as it is anti-dilutive.

 

32


Table of Contents

NOTE 15. SEGMENT, GEOGRAPHICAL AND CUSTOMER INFORMATION

Segment Information

The following tables set forth certain information relating to our reportable business segments:

Revenues:

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Consumer and Computation Division

   $ 62,305      $ 82,777      $ 114,328      $ 145,729   

Data Communications Division

     25,514        34,444        45,914        62,774   

Memory and Imaging Division

     66,213        88,857        132,245        163,503   

Other

     1,752        3,502        2,606        5,956   
                                

Total revenues

   $ 155,784      $ 209,580      $ 295,093      $ 377,962   
                                
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes:         
     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Consumer and Computation Division

   $ (3,990   $ 2,906      $ (18,219   $ (2,839

Data Communications Division

     4,379        7,420        2,788        12,032   

Memory and Imaging Division

     3,247        13,461        (3,762     21,939   

Other

     (6,808     (4,876     (12,767     (10,392

Unallocated items:

        

Amortization of intangibles and other acquisition-related costs

     (834     (1,658     (2,153     (3,317

Restructuring charges

     (1,089     (1,958     (7,135     (4,370

Stock-based compensation

     (37,679     (19,174     (85,923     (35,363

Impairment of property and equipment

     —          —          —          (1,734

Impact of FSP APB 14-1

     (392     (8,150     (789     (14,649

Impairment of investments

     —          (4,255     (1,731     (4,468

Other

     (795     1,297        20        375   
                                

Loss before income taxes

   $ (43,961   $ (14,987   $ (129,671   $ (42,786
                                

 

33


Table of Contents

Geographical Information:

The following table presents our revenues by geographical locations:

 

     Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
     June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
   June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
     (In thousands)

United States

   $ 33,647    $ 55,135    $ 69,896    $ 112,584

Europe

     20,364      29,408      40,750      56,785

Asia:

           

China

     40,874      39,877      67,594      62,649

Hong Kong

     14,175      15,189      31,683      26,019

Taiwan

     15,207      20,965      26,927      34,048

Other

     31,517      49,006      58,243      85,877
                           

Total revenues

   $ 155,784    $ 209,580    $ 295,093    $ 377,962
                           

Customer Information

We sell our products to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and to electronic components distributors who resell these products to OEMs, or their subcontract manufacturers. For the three and six months ended June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008, no one end customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues. For the three and six months ended June 28, 2009, one distributor, Avnet Inc. accounted for 13.1% and 13.8% of our total revenues. No other distributor accounted for greater than 10% of total revenue for the three and six months ended June 29, 2008.

 

34


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties, which are discussed in the “Forward-Looking Statements” section under Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

General

Our mission is to transform Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (“Cypress”) from a traditional, broad-line semiconductor company into a leading supplier of proprietary and programmable solutions in systems everywhere. We deliver high-performance, mixed-signal, programmable solutions that provide customers with integration, rapid time-to-market and system value. Our offerings include Programmable System-on-Chip (“PSoC ® ”) products, capacitive sensing and touchscreen solutions, universal serial bus (“USB”) controllers, and general-purpose programmable clocks and memories. Cypress also provides wired and wireless connectivity solutions, including, respectively, West Bridge ® controllers, which enhance performance in multimedia handsets, and the CyFi low-power RF solution, offering reliability, simplicity and power-efficiency. Cypress also offers a wide portfolio of static random access memories, nonvolatile memories and image sensor products. Cypress serves numerous markets, including consumer, computation, data communications, automotive, medical, industrial and white goods.

Our organization included the following business segments as of the end of the second half of fiscal 2009:

 

Business Segments

 

Description

Consumer and Computation Division   a product division focusing on PSoC, USB and timing solutions
Data Communications Division   a product division focusing on data communication devices for wireless handset and professional / personal video systems
Memory and Imaging Division   a product division focusing on static random access memories, nonvolatile memories and image sensor products
Other   includes Cypress Envirosystems, and AgigaTech, Inc., both majority-owned subsidiaries of Cypress, the ONS and China business units and certain foundry-related services and corporate expenses

Spin-Off of SunPower Corporation (“SunPower”)

On September 29, 2008, the first day of our fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we completed the distribution of all of our 42.0 million shares of SunPower Class B common stock to our stockholders (the “Spin-Off”). The distribution was made pro rata to our stockholders of record as of the close of trading on September 17, 2008. As a result of the Spin-Off, each stockholder received approximately 0.274 of a share of SunPower Class B common stock for each share of Cypress’s common stock held by such stockholder. The market value of the distribution was approximately $2.6 billion based on the closing price of SunPower common stock on September 29, 2008.

We received a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service in April 2008 with respect to certain tax issues arising under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code in connection with the Spin-Off. The distribution was structured to be tax-free to us and our stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except in respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares.

See Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of the Spin-Off. Unless otherwise indicated, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes discussion of our continuing operations.

Adjustments to Cypress’s Stock Plans:

On August 1, 2008, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved certain adjustments to our 1994 and 1999 Stock Plans (together, the “Plans”) and outstanding employee equity awards in anticipation of the Spin-Off. These adjustments were consistent with and similar to the provisions in the Plans providing for automatic adjustment of service provider equity awards and share pools pursuant to a stock split or similar change in capitalization effected without receipt of consideration by us.

On September 30, 2008, following the Spin-Off, outstanding employee equity awards under the Plans were adjusted by a conversion ratio of 4.12022 (the “Conversion Ratio”). Specifically, the number of shares issuable pursuant to the outstanding awards was multiplied by the Conversion Ratio and rounded down to the nearest whole share. In addition, the per-share exercise price of outstanding options was divided by the Conversion Ratio and rounded up to the nearest whole cent. Also, the number of authorized

 

35


Table of Contents

but unissued shares reserved for issuance under the Plans and the ESPP and the numerical provisions under the Plans’ annual grant limits and automatic option grant provisions, including automatic grants to Board members, were multiplied by the Conversion Ratio and rounded down to the nearest whole share.

Stock-Based Compensation:

The modification of the outstanding employee equity awards and the ESPP approved by the Board on August 1, 2008 resulted in additional non-cash stock-based compensation. The amount was measured based upon the difference between the fair value of the awards immediately before and after the modification. Of the total additional non-cash stock-based compensation, $17.8 million was recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and $46.5 million will be recognized over the remaining vesting periods on an accelerated basis.

Manufacturing Strategy

Our core manufacturing strategy—“flexible manufacturing”—combines capacity from leading foundries with output from our internal manufacturing facilities. This initiative allows us to meet rapid swings in customer demand while lessening the burden of high fixed costs, a capability that is particularly important in high-volume consumer markets that we serve with our leading programmable product portfolio.

Consistent with this strategy, our Board approved a plan in December 2007 to exit our manufacturing facility in Texas and transfer production to our more cost-competitive facility in Minnesota and outside foundries. We substantially completed our exit plan by the end of fiscal 2008.

Results of Operations

Revenues

The following table summarizes our consolidated revenues by segments:

 

     Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended

(In thousands)

   June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008
   June 28,
2009
   June 29,
2008

Consumer and Computation Division

   $ 62,305    $ 82,777    $ 114,328    $ 145,729

Data Communications Division

     25,514      34,444      45,914      62,774

Memory and Imaging Division

     66,213      88,857      132,245      163,503

Other

     1,752      3,502      2,606      5,956
                           

Total revenues

   $ 155,784    $ 209,580    $ 295,093    $ 377,962
                           

Consumer and Computation Division:

Revenues from the Consumer and Computation Division decreased approximately $20.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, or approximately 24.7%, compared to the same prior-year period. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of approximately $11.4 million in sales of our USB mainly due to the economic slowdown impacting demand in PC applications and consumer devices and increased competition in the consumer market. The decrease was also attributable to a decrease of $6.2 million in sales of our TSBU general purpose timing solutions resulting from reduced demand from certain large consumer and personal computer customers. Despite the current challenging economic environment, our PSOC product families, including our touchscreen family, continued to gain new design wins, expand their customer base and increase market penetration in a variety of end-market applications.

Revenues from the Consumer and Computation Division decreased approximately $31.4 million in the first half of fiscal 2009, or approximately 21.5%, compared to the same prior-year period. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of approximately $18.0 million in sales of our USB and general-purpose timing solutions mainly due to the economic slowdown impacting demand in PC applications and consumer devices and increased competition in the consumer market. The decrease was also attributable to a decrease of $10.4 million in sales of our TSBU solutions resulting from reduced demand from certain large consumer and personal computer customers. Despite the current challenging economic environment, our PSOC product families, including our touchscreen family, continued to gain new design wins, expand their customer base and increase market penetration in a variety of end-market applications.

 

36


Table of Contents

Data Communications Division:

Revenues from the Data Communications Division decreased $8.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, or approximately 25.9%, compared to the same prior-year period. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $6.4 million in sales of 1) our specialty memory products due to the continued slow down in demand in the base-station market and 2) our programmable logic devices primarily due to the decline in military shipments.

Revenues from the Data Communications Division decreased $16.9 million in the first half of fiscal 2009, or approximately 26.9%, compared to the same prior-year period. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $16.5 million in sales related to certain end of life products, our programmable logic devices primarily due to the decline in military shipments and our specialty memory products due to a continued decline in end consumer demand.

Memory and Imaging Division:

Revenues from the Memory and Imaging Division decreased $22.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, or approximately 25.5%, compared to the same prior-year period. The decrease was primarily attributable to the economic slowdown impacting us by reducing sales by $22.5 million of our SRAM products in networking, consumer and communications applications.

Revenues from the Memory and Imaging Division decreased $31.3 million in the first half of fiscal 2009, or approximately 19.1%, compared to the same prior-year period. The decrease was primarily attributable to the economic slowdown impacting us by reducing sales by $30.9 million of our SRAM products in networking, consumer and communications applications.

Other:

Revenues from Other decreased $1.8 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, or approximately 50.0%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2008. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to a decrease of $2.6 million in sales related to Silicon Light Machines which we divested in fiscal 2008.

Revenues from Other decreased $3.4 million in the first half of fiscal 2009, or approximately 56.3%, compared to the first half of fiscal 2008. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to a decrease of $4.5 million in sales related to Silicon Light Machines which we divested in fiscal 2008.

 

37


Table of Contents

Cost of Revenues/Gross Margins

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  

(In thousands, except percentages)

   June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 

Cost of revenues

   $ 98,672      $ 107,852      $ 203,966      $ 196,085   

Gross margin

     36.7     48.5     30.9     48.1

Gross margin percentage decreased from 48.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 to 36.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Gross margin percentage decreased from 48.1% in the first half of fiscal 2008 to 30.9% in the first half of fiscal 2009. The gross margin percentage decreases were primarily due to the stock-based compensation expense allocated to cost of revenue which increased by $6.6 million and $17.3 million during the three months and first half of fiscal 2009. This increase was mainly due to the modification of the outstanding employee equity awards approved by the Board in connection with the Spin-Off. The gross margin percentage was also unfavorably impacted by inventory write-downs, cost absorption and the reduced revenue in 2009.

Research and Development (“R&D”) Expenses

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  

(In thousands, except percentages)

   June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 

R&D expenses

   $ 48,196      $ 45,392      $ 98,342      $ 89,542   

As a percentage of revenues

     30.9     21.7     33.3     23.7

R&D expenditures increased $2.8 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to same prior-year period. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $5.6 million in stock-based compensation expense mainly due to the modification of the outstanding employee equity awards approved by the Board in connection with the Spin-Off. This increase in stock-based compensation was partially offset by the reduction in employee related labor and other costs associated with the implementation of our Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan.

R&D expenditures increased $8.8 million in the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to same prior-year period. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $13.3 million in stock-based compensation expense mainly due to the modification of the outstanding employee equity awards approved by the Board in connection with the Spin-Off. This increase was partially offset by the reduction in employee related labor and other costs associated with the implementation of our Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  

(In thousands, except percentages)

   June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 

SG&A expenses

   $ 53,069      $ 61,111      $ 113,784      $ 118,279   

As a percentage of revenues

     34.1     29.2     38.6     31.3

SG&A expenses decreased $8.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the same prior-year period. The decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction in employee related labor and other costs associated with the implementation of our Fiscal 2008/2009 Restructuring Plan as well as other cost reduction efforts. The decrease was offset by an increase of $6.3 million in stock-based compensation expense mainly due to the modification of the outstanding employee equity awards approved by the Board in connection with the Spin-Off.

SG&A expenses decreased $4.5 million in the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the same prior-year period. The decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction in employee related labor and other costs associated with the implementation of our Fiscal 2008/2009 Restructuring Plan as well as other cost reduction efforts. The decrease was offset by an increase of $20.0 million in stock-based compensation expense mainly due to the modification of the outstanding employee equity awards approved by the Board in connection with the Spin-Off.

 

38


Table of Contents

Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangible Assets

For the three months ended June 28, 2009, amortization decreased approximately $0.8 million as compared to the corresponding fiscal 2008 period. The decrease in amortization was primarily due to certain intangible assets that had been fully amortized during fiscal 2008 offset by the increase in intangibles acquired as part of the Simtek acquisition.

Restructuring

We recorded restructuring charges of $7.1 million and $4.4 million during the six months ended June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008, respectively. The amount recorded during the three months ended June 28, 2009 included a provision of $0.3 million for the Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan and $0.8 million for the Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan. During the six months ended June 28, 2009 the savings from our actions taken to date was approximately $11.3 million. Upon completion of all of our actions we anticipate our savings in fiscal year 2010 to be approximately $15.8 million per quarter. We estimate the savings will proportionately impact sales general and administrative expense by 24%, cost of goods sold by 54% and research and development expense by 22% although there can be no assurance of this.

Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan:

The charges in 2009 relate to a restructuring plan which was initiated during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and was part of a company-wide cost saving initiative aimed to reduce operating costs in response to the economic downturn (“Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan”). In accordance with SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Post Employment Benefits” (SFAS No. 112) and SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (SFAS No. 146), we recorded a total of $19.8 million under the Fiscal 2008/9 Restructuring Plan, of which $19.7 million was related to personnel costs and $0.1 million was related to other exit costs. The determination of when we accrue for severance costs, and which standard applies, depends on whether the termination benefits are provided under a one-time benefit arrangement as defined by SFAS No. 146 or under an on-going benefit arrangement as described by SFAS No. 112. Restructuring activities related to personnel costs are summarized as follows:

 

(In thousands)

      

Balance as of December 28, 2008

   $ 7,374   

Provision

     7,741   

Non cash forgiveness of employee loans

     (73

Cash payments

     (3,214
        

Balance as of March 29, 2009

     11,828   

Provision

     327   

Cash payments

     (6,311
        

Balance as of June 28, 2009

   $ 5,844   
        

Upon completion of our restructuring activities we expect to eliminate approximately 778 positions of which approximately 431 positions are manufacturing related and 347 are corporate and other related positions.

As of June 28, 2009, approximately 542 of the employees to be terminated in these restructurings have been terminated and the majority of the remaining 236 employee terminations are expected to be completed by the end of fiscal 2009.

Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan:

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we implemented a restructuring plan to exit our manufacturing facility located in Round Rock, Texas (“Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan”). Under the Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan, we transitioned production from the Texas facility to our more cost-effective facility in Bloomington, Minnesota as well as outside third-party foundries. The Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan includes the termination of employees and the disposal of assets, primarily consisting of land, building and manufacturing equipment, located in the Texas facility. The Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan does not involve the discontinuation of any material product lines or other functions.

To date, we recorded total restructuring charges of $9.5 million related to the Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan. We recorded $9.9 million of expense in fiscal 2008 and $0.5 million of expense in fiscal 2007. We also recorded a $0.9 million credit in fiscal 2009 which relates to the $1.5 million net gain on the sale of equipment located at our Texas facility which was partially offset by a $0.6 million workforce reserve. Of the total restructuring charges, $8.0 million was related to personnel costs and $1.5 million was related to property, plant and equipment and other exit costs.

 

39


Table of Contents

Personnel Costs:

Restructuring activities related to personnel costs are summarized as follows:

 

(In thousands)

      

Balance as of December 28, 2008

   $ 2,721   

Additional provision

     518   

Cash payments

     (2,476
        

Balance as of March 29, 2009

     763   

Additional provision

     60   

Cash payments

     (629
        

Balance as of June 28, 2009

   $ 194   
        

We completed the termination of the remaining employees in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. These employees were primarily in manufacturing functions.

Property, Plant and Equipment:

The Texas facility ceased operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. As management has committed to a plan to dispose of the assets associated with the facility by sale, we have classified the assets as held for sale and valued the assets at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value. Fair value was determined by prices to be received from buyers of the assets or by market prices estimated by third parties that specialize in sales of such assets. Based on this analysis in fiscal 2008, we recorded a write-down of $1.9 million related to the assets and $1.2 million of related disposal and other facility costs.

The following table summarizes the net book value of the remaining restructured assets that were classified as held for sale and included in “Other current assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 28, 2009:

 

     June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008
     (In thousands)

Land

   $ 994    $ 994

Equipment

     373      1,112

Buildings and leasehold improvements

     6,430      6,430
             

Total property, plant and equipment, net

   $ 7,797    $ 8,536
             

We expect to complete the disposal of the restructured assets by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009; however, there can be no assurance of this and our ability to complete the sale of any restructured assets may be impacted by the current economic and credit conditions.

Interest Income

Interest income decreased $13.7 million in the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the first half of fiscal 2008. The decrease was primarily driven by lower average interest rates as we shifted our portfolio to more liquid and safe investments such as U.S. treasuries, coupled with lower average cash and investment balances.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $0.9 million in the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to $19.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 which resulted in the recording of $16.2 million of interest expense in the first half of fiscal 2008 compared to $0.8 million in the first half of 2009. Interest expense also decreased in the first half of 2008 due to the higher balance of our convertible debt in fiscal 2008.

 

40


Table of Contents

Other Income (Expense), Net

The following table summarizes the components of other expense, net:

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  

(In thousands)

   June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 

Impairment of investments

   $ —        $ (4,255   $ (1,731   $ (4,468

Foreign currency exchange gain (loss), net

     (132     2,070        319        2,378   

Changes in fair value of investment under the employee deferred compensation pan

     2,310        60        1,636        (2,476

Other

     (93     (326     226        (188
                                

Total other income (expense), net

   $ 2,085      $ (2,451   $ 450      $ (4,754
                                

Employee Deferred Compensation Plan:

We have a deferred compensation plan, which provides certain key employees, including our executive management, with the ability to defer the receipt of compensation in order to accumulate funds for retirement on a tax deferred basis. We do not make contributions to the deferred compensation plan and we do not guarantee returns on the investments. Participant deferrals and investment gains and losses remain our assets and are subject to claims of general creditors.

We account for the deferred compensation plan in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 97-14, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation Arrangements Where Amounts Earned Are Held in a Rabbi Trust and Invested.” In accordance with EITF Issue No. 97-14, the assets are recorded at fair value in each reporting period with the offset being recorded in “Other income (expense), net.” The liabilities are recorded at fair value in each reporting period with the offset being recorded as an operating expense or income.

 

41


Table of Contents

All non-cash expense and income recorded under the deferred compensation plan were included in the following line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
    June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 
     (In thousands)  

Changes in fair value of assets recorded in:

        

Other expense, net

   $ 2,310      $ 60      $ 1,636      $ (2,476

Changes in fair value of liabilities recorded in:

        

Cost of revenues

     (252     (19     (190     923   

Research and development expenses

     (749     (21     (654     1,065   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     (1,572     (16     (1,080     808   
                                

Total income (expense)

   $ (263   $ 4      $ (288   $ 320   
                                

Income Taxes

Our income tax expense was $1.3 million on loss before tax of $44.0 million for the three months ended June 28, 2009 and income tax benefit was $14.3 million on loss before tax of $15.0 million for the three months ended June 29, 2008. Our income tax expense was $3.9 million for the six months ended June 28, 2009 and income tax benefit was $12.0 million for the six months ended June 28, 2008. The tax provision for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009 was primarily attributable to non-U.S. taxes on income earned in foreign jurisdictions. The tax benefit for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 was primarily attributable to a change in an estimate of potential withholding tax liability in a foreign jurisdiction including accrued interest, which resulted in the recognition of $14.1 million in tax benefits, a release of previously accrued taxes and interest of $7.3 million due to the resolution of the U.S. income tax examination, and the amortization of a deferred tax liability associated with purchased intangible assets. The tax benefit for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 was partially offset by non-U.S. taxes on income earned in foreign jurisdictions and tax accruals (primarily alternative minimum tax) of $5.5 million from a resolution of the U.S. income tax examination for the tax years 2003 and 2004.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table summarizes information regarding our cash and investments, working capital and debt:

 

     As of

(In thousands)

   June 28,
2009
   December 28,
2008

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

   $ 245,642    $ 237,792

Working capital

   $ 243,359    $ 248,397

Convertible debt—short-term

   $ 27,726    $ 27,023

Key Components of Cash Flows

 

     Six Months Ended  

(In thousands)

   June 28,
2009
    June 29,
2008
 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations

   $ (10,273   $ 49,159   

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations

   $ (8,369   $ 37,487   

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations

   $ 26,735      $ (266,178

During the six months ended June 28, 2009, net cash used in operating activities was $10.3 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $49.2 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008. Operating cash flows for the six months ended June 28, 2009 were primarily driven by a net loss adjusted for certain non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, non-cash interest expense, restructuring charges and a net decrease in operating assets and liabilities. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily driven by lower revenues. The decrease in inventories was primarily attributable to decreased demand requirements. The decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities was primarily driven by a decrease in sales which impacted our overall business activity.

During the six months ended June 28, 2009, net cash used in investing activities decreased $45.9 million compared to the six months ended June 29 2008. For the six months ended June 28, 2009, our investing activities primarily included: cash outflows for $11.5 million of property and equipment expenditures and $0.6 million from purchases of our investments, net of sales. For the six months ended June 29, 2008, our investing activities primarily included $21.2 million of property and equipment expenditures. These cash outflows were offset by cash proceeds of $59.5 million from sales or maturities of our investments, net of purchases.

 

42


Table of Contents

During the six months ended June 28, 2009, net cash provided by financing activities was $26.7 million compared to net cash used by financing activities of $266.2 million for the six months ended June 29, 2008. For the six months ended June 28, 2009, our financing activities primarily included $11.2 million in cash used to repurchase our common shares, offset by proceeds of $43.6 million from the issuance of common shares under our employee stock plans. For the six months ended June 29, 2008, we used $277.1 million in cash to repurchase our common shares, partially offset by cash proceeds of $15.4 million from the issuance of common shares under our employee stock plans.

Liquidity and Contractual Obligations

Convertible Debt:

As of June 28, 2009, the outstanding principal amount of the 1.00% Notes was $27.7 million. Holders of the 1.00% Notes have the right to convert their 1.00% Notes in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Indenture and is payable on maturity at September 15, 2009. The 1.00% Notes are initially convertible, subject to certain conditions, into cash up to the lesser of the principal amount of the 1.00% Notes or the conversion value. If the conversion value of the 1.00% Notes is greater than $1,000, then the excess conversion value will be convertible into cash or shares of Cypress’s common stock, or a combination of cash and shares, at our election. As of June 28, 2009, the conversion price of the 1.00% Notes was $5.64 per share.

As of June 28, 2009 the holders of the 1.00% Notes have the right to convert. Holders who convert after June 15, 2009 will not receive a make-whole adjustment unless there is another fundamental change, as defined in the agreement. The amount that will be paid on conversion will be calculated based on the 20 trading days beginning on August 13, 2009, the 22nd trading day prior to the maturity date of September 15, 2009. For example, if the average stock price was $10.50 on September 15, 2009, and we were settling in cash, the face value of the convertible note, its premium, the warrants and the convertible note hedge, we would be required to pay approximately $48.7 million.

Auction Rate Securities:

As of June 28, 2009, all of our auction rate securities have experienced failed auctions due to sell orders exceeding buy orders. Currently, these failures are not believed to be a credit issue with the underlying investments, but rather caused by a lack of liquidity. We have classified our auction rate securities totaling $34.0 million as long-term investments as of June 28, 2009.

During fiscal 2009, we performed analyses to assess the fair value of the auction rate securities. In the absence of a liquid market to value these securities, we prepared a valuation model based on discounted cash flows.

Based on the discounted cash flows, we estimated that the auction rate securities would be valued at approximately 87% of their stated par value as of June 28, 2009 and the auction rate securities are stated at that value.

Stock Repurchase Program:

The Board has approved $600.0 million under the stock repurchase program. Stock repurchases under the program may be made through open market and privately negotiated transactions at times and in such amounts as management deems appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, cash requirements, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market conditions. The program may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice.

During fiscal 2008, Cypress used $375.6 million in cash to repurchase a total of approximately 37.1 million shares at an average share price of $10.13. Prior to the spin-off of SunPower, Cypress used $277.1 million in cash to repurchase approximately 12.6 million shares at an average share price of $21.95 and post spin off Cypress used $98.5 million in cash to repurchase approximately 24.5 million shares at an average share price of $4.03. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, Cypress used $6.5 million to repurchase approximately 1.4 million shares at an average share price of $4.59. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we used $4.7 million to repurchase approximately 0.7 million shares at an average share price of $6.82.

As of June 28, 2009, the remaining balance available for future stock repurchases was $213.2 million under the stock repurchase program.

Due to certain spin-related tax limitations, management does not anticipate repurchasing more than 2.0 million shares for the next few quarters and possibly longer.

Purchase Obligations:

We have outstanding purchase obligations, which primarily include non-cancelable purchase orders for materials, services, manufacturing equipment, building improvements and supplies in the ordinary course of business. Purchase obligations are defined as enforceable agreements that are legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including quantity, price and timing. As of June 28, 2009, non-cancelable purchase obligations totaled approximately $107.5 million.

 

43


Table of Contents

Capital Resources and Financial Condition

Our long-term strategy is to maintain a minimum amount of cash and cash equivalents for operational purposes and to invest the remaining amount of our cash in interest-bearing and highly liquid cash equivalents and debt securities. As of June 28, 2009, in addition to $212.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, we had $32.8 million invested in short-term investments for a total cash and short-term investment position of $245.6 million that is available for use in current operations. In addition, we had $35.5 million of long-term investments primarily consisting of illiquid auction rate securities.

We believe that liquidity provided by existing cash, cash equivalents and investments and our borrowing arrangements will provide sufficient capital to meet our requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, should prevailing economic conditions and/or financial, business and other factors beyond our control adversely affect our estimates of our future cash requirements, we could be required to fund our cash requirements by alternative financing. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if needed, would be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. We may choose at any time to raise additional capital or debt to strengthen our financial position, facilitate growth, enter into strategic initiatives and provide us with additional flexibility to take advantage of other business opportunities that arise.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement

During fiscal 2005, we entered into a strategic foundry partnership with Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (“Grace”), pursuant to which we have transferred certain of our proprietary process technologies to Grace’s Shanghai, China facility. In accordance with a foundry agreement, we purchase wafers from Grace that are produced using these process technologies.

Grace has leased certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment from a financing company. In conjunction with the lease agreement, we have entered into a series of guarantees with the financing company for the benefit of Grace. Under the guarantees, we have agreed to unconditional guarantees to the financing company of the rental payments payable by Grace for the leased equipment under the master lease agreement. If Grace fails to pay any of the quarterly rental payments, we will be obligated to pay such outstanding amounts within 10 days of a written demand from the financing company. If we fail to pay such amount, interest will accrue at a rate of 9% per annum on any unpaid amounts. To date, we have not been required to make any payments under these guarantees. As of June 2009 we updated our assessment of the likelihood that we would have to settle the outstanding lease payments and we determined that is was not probable. As a result we have not recorded any liability relating to outstanding lease payments.

Pursuant to the guarantees, we issued irrevocable letters of credit to secure the rental payments under the guarantees in the event a demand is made by the financing company on us. The amount available under the letters of credit will decline according to schedules mutually agreed upon by us and the financing company. If we default, the financing company will be entitled to draw on the letters of credit.

In connection with the guarantees, we were granted options to purchase ordinary shares of Grace. As of June 28, 2009, we determined that the fair value of the guarantees and the options was not material to our consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes the terms and status of the guarantees:

 

     Number of
Guarantees
   Lease Term
of Equipment
Under Each
Guarantee
   Outstanding
Rental Payments
   Outstanding
Irrevocable Letters of Credit
   Grace Options
Granted to
Cypress

Fiscal Year

         At
Inception
   As of
June 28,
2009
   At
Inception
   As of
June 28,
2009
  
               (In thousands)

2006

   One    36 months    $ 8,255    $ 1,376    $ 6,392    $ 1,697    2,272

2007

   Five    36 months      42,278      14,781      32,726      14,999    26,924

2008

   One    36 months      10,372      6,050      7,918      5,608    11,684
                                      
         $ 60,905    $ 22,207    $ 47,036    $ 22,304    40,880
                                      

 

44


Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risks

Excluding auction rate securities, our investment portfolio consists of a variety of financial instruments that exposes us to interest rate risk, including, but not limited to, money market funds, commercial paper and corporate securities. These investments are generally classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded on our balance sheets at fair market value with their related unrealized gain or loss reflected as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Due to the relatively short-term nature of our investment portfolio, we do not believe that an immediate 10% increase in interest rates would have a material effect on the fair market value of our portfolio. Since we believe we have the ability to liquidate this portfolio, we do not expect our operating results or cash flows to be materially affected to any significant degree by a sudden change in market interest rates on our investment portfolio.

Auction Rate Securities

As of June 28, 2009, we have classified all of our auction rate securities as Level 3 financial instruments. Auction rate securities are investments with contractual maturities generally between 20 and 30 years. The auction rate securities held by us are primarily backed by student loans and are over-collateralized, insured and guaranteed by the U.S. Federal Department of Education.

As of June 28, 2009, all auction rate securities held by us were rated as either AAA or Aaa by the major independent rating agencies except for 5% of the student loan auction rate securities which were downgraded from AAA to Baa3 in the first fiscal quarter of 2009. The downgrade event was due to the higher rates the issuer is paying out versus the lending rates, which is preventing the issuer from building excess spread as required under the prospectus. If the financial market continues to deteriorate, future downgrades could potentially impact the rating of our auction rate securities.

As of June 28, 2009, all of our auction rate securities have experienced failed auctions due to sell orders exceeding buy orders. Currently, these failures are not believed to be a credit issue with the underlying investments, but rather caused by a lack of liquidity. Under the contractual terms, the issuer is obligated to pay penalty rates should an auction fail. The funds associated with failed auctions are not expected to be accessible until one of the following occurs: a successful auction occurs, the issuer redeems the issue, a buyer is found outside of the auction process or the underlying securities have matured. Given these circumstances and the lack of liquidity, we have classified our auction rate securities totaling $34.0 million as long-term investments as of June 28, 2009.

We performed analyses to assess the fair value of the auction rate securities. In the absence of a liquid market to value these securities, we prepared a valuation model based on discounted cash flows. The assumptions used for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 were as follows:

 

   

7 years to liquidity;

 

   

continued receipt of contractual interest which provides a premium spread for failed auctions; and

 

   

discount rates of 3.0%—6.1%, which incorporates a spread for both credit and liquidity risk.

Based on these assumptions, we estimated that the auction rate securities would be valued at approximately 87% of their stated par value as of June 28, 2009. The following table summarizes certain information related to our auction rate securities as of June 28, 2009:

 

     Fair Value    Fair Value Given a 100
Basis Point
Increase in Interest Rates
   Fair Value Given a 100
Basis Point
Decrease in Interest Rates
     (In thousands)

Auction rate securities

   $ 33,967    $ 37,364    $ 30,570

Convertible Debt

The fair value of our convertible debt is subject to interest rate risk, market risk and other factors due to the convertible feature. The fair value of the convertible debt will generally increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. In addition, the fair value of the convertible debt will generally increase as our common stock prices increase and decrease as the stock prices fall. The interest and market value changes affect the fair value of our convertible debt but do not impact our financial position, cash flows or results of operations due to the fixed nature of the debt obligations. The following table summarizes certain information related to our convertible debt as of June 28, 2009:

 

Convertible Debt

   Fair Value    Fair Value Given a 10%
Increase in Market Prices
   Fair Value Given a 10%
Decrease in Market Prices
     (In thousands)

1.00% convertible senior notes

   $ 46,968    $ 51,665    $ 42,271

 

45


Table of Contents

Investments in Publicly Traded and Privately Held Companies

We have equity investments in certain publicly traded companies. The marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale investments and are recorded at fair value with unrealized gain (loss) reported as a component in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the common stock is subject to market price volatility. The following table summarizes certain information related to these investments as of June 28, 2009:

 

Investments

   Fair Value    Fair Value Given a 10%
Increase in Stock Prices
   Fair Value Given a 10%
Decrease in Stock Prices
     (In thousands)

Marketable equity securities

   $ 4,141    $ 4,555    $ 3,727

We also have equity investments in several privately held companies, many of which are start-ups or in development stages. These investments are inherently risky as the market for the technologies or products they have under development are typically in the early stages and may never materialize. As our equity investments generally do not permit us to exert significant influence or control, these amounts generally represent our cost of the investments, less any adjustments we make when we determine that an investment’s net realizable value is less than its carrying cost. As of June 28, 2009, the carrying value of our investments in privately held companies was $1.2 million.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We operate and sell products in various global markets and purchase capital equipment using foreign currencies. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our operating margins. For example, when foreign currencies appreciate against the U.S. dollar, inventory and expenses denominated in foreign currencies become more expensive. An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products more expensive for international customers, thus potentially leading to a reduction in demand, our sales and profitability. Furthermore, many of our competitors are foreign companies that could benefit from such a currency fluctuation, making it more difficult for us to compete with those companies. Historically, we have conducted hedging activities that involve the use of currency forward contracts and options to minimize our exposure to changes in the foreign exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and other currencies; however, we cannot predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our business and results of operations.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and after considering the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three month period ended June 28, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

46


Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The information required by this item is included in Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1, Part 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2008, and as updated in our Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2009.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Stock Repurchase Program:

The Board of Directors has approved $600.0 million under the stock repurchase program. Stock repurchases under the program may be made through open market and privately negotiated transactions at times and in such amounts as management deems appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market conditions. The program may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice.

During fiscal 2008, Cypress used $375.6 million in cash to repurchase a total of approximately 37.1 million shares at an average share price of $10.13. Prior to the spin-off of SunPower, Cypress used $277.1 million in cash to repurchase approximately 12.6 million shares at an average share price of $21.95 and post spin off Cypress used $98.5 million in cash to repurchase approximately 24.5 million shares at an average share price of $4.03. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, Cypress used $6.5 million to repurchase approximately 1.4 million shares at an average share price of $4.59. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we used $4.7 million to repurchase approximately 0.7 million shares at an average share price of $6.82.

As of June 28, 2009, the remaining balance available for future stock repurchases was $213.2 million under the stock repurchase program.

The following table sets forth information with respect to repurchases of our common stock made during the first half of fiscal 2009:

 

Periods

   Total Number of
Shares Purchased
   Average Price Paid
per Share
   Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Programs
   Total Dollar Value
of Shares
That May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans
or Programs
     (In thousands, except per-share amounts)

December 29, 2008—January 25, 2009

   —      $ —      —      $ —  

January 26, 2009—February 22, 2009

   1,416    $ 4.59    1,416    $ 217,900

February 23, 2009—March 29, 2009

   —      $ —      —      $ —  
               

As of March 29, 2009

   1,416    $ 4.59    1,416   

March 30, 2009—April 26, 2009

   —      $ —      —     

April 27, 2009—May 24, 2009

   500    $ 6.74    500      214,525

May 25, 2009—June 28, 2009

   185    $ 6.98    185      213,234
               

As of June 28, 2009

   2,101    $ 5.32    2,101   
               

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 9, 2008, our stockholders voted on the following proposals:

 

  1. Election of seven directors;

 

  2. Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2009; and;

 

  3. Approval of the Cypress’s 1994 Stock Plan amendment to provide stock option exchange flexibility

 

47


Table of Contents

For a more detailed discussion of these proposals, please refer to our Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2009.

The results were as follows:

 

     Number of Shares
     For    Withheld    Against    Abstain    Broker
Non-Vote

Proposal 1:

              

W. Steve Albrecht

   122,546,162    1,972,986    —      —      —  

Eric A. Benhamou

   115,356,573    9,162,575    —      —      —  

Lloyd Carney

   117,350,506    7,168,642    —      —      —  

James R. Long

   117,311,143    7,208,005    —      —      —  

J. Daniel McCranie

   121,125,925    3,365,791    —      —      —  

T. J. Rodgers

   123,401,979    1,117,169    —      —      —  

Evert Van de Ven

   123,125,925    1,393,223    —      —      —  

Proposal 2

   122,554,652    —      1,766,160    198,336    —  

Proposal 3

   28,702,249    —      71,878,553    192,766    —  

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Release of First Half of 2009 PARS

In 2007, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors granted, under the Company’s 1994 Stock Plan, performance-based restricted stock units (“PARS”) to certain employees of the Company, including our Named Executive Officers. The PARS awarded in 2007 may be earned ratably over five years subject to performance milestones that are determined on at least a yearly basis.

On March 12, 2009, the Committee approved the performance milestone achievements for the first half of 2009.

In connection with the Committee’s determination of the achievement of the first half of 2009 PARS performance milestones, the following shares were released (prior to required tax payments) to our Named Executive Officers:

 

Named Executive Officer

   Target    Earned

T.J. Rodgers

   329,618    326,387

Brad W. Buss

   206,011    203,991

Christopher Seams

   164,809    163,193

Paul Keswick

   164,809    163,193

Norman P. Taffe

   141,633    140,245

We did not pay any other equity or cash bonuses (including bonuses under the Performance Bonus Plan, the Key Employee Bonus Plan, or the Performance Profit Sharing Bonus Plan) to our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officer, with respect to the first half of fiscal year 2009.

Setting of Performance Milestones under Second Half of 2009 PARS

On August 6, 2009, the Committee also set three performance milestones required for 50% of the total 2009 targeted PARS (“Six Month Target”) related to the second half of 2009 (“Performance Period”). The milestones are currently set to be achieved by the end of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2009.

For all Named Executive Officers, 20% of the Six Month Target can be earned at the end of the Performance Period if we meet or exceed a certain non-GAAP gross margin percentage, adjusted for any non-planned, one-time or unusual transactions for the Performance Period. If the non-GAAP gross margin percentage amount is achieved for the Performance Period, the payout is 100% and adjusts on a linear scale down to 0% payout if the achieved specified non-GAAP gross margin percentage is below 0% of the target.

For all Named Executive Officers, up to 40% of the Six Month Target can be earned at the end of the Performance Period if our common stock attains certain threshold levels of performance compared with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Sector Index (“SOXX”).

 

48


Table of Contents

If the performance milestone is achieved at a certain performance percentage threshold for the Performance Period, the payout is 100% and adjusts on a linear scale down to 0% payout if our stock price is less than SOXX by a specified percentage point for the Performance Period.

For all Named Executive Officers, up to 40% of the Six Month Target can be earned at the end of the Performance Period upon the achievement of a certain non-GAAP operating income target for the Performance Period, adjusted for any non-planned, one-time and unusual transactions as designated by the Committee. If the performance milestone is achieved at a specified target for the Performance Period, the payout is 100% and adjusts on a linear scale to 0% payout if the non-GAAP operating income is a specified amount above the target.

For all Named Executive Officers, if the performance milestones as approved by the Committee at time of release described above are not achieved for the Performance Period, the portion of the Six Month Target PARS for the applicable milestones are forfeited and are not able to be earned in a future period.

All PARS are settled, following approval by the Compensation Committee that the performance milestones have been achieved, in shares of common stock, on a one share for one-unit basis (with each share adjusted for any stock splits, stock dividends, spin-offs or other changes in capitalization effected without receipt of consideration by us).

The following table sets forth our Named Executive Officers’ Six Month Target shares for the Performance Period subject to performance:

 

Named Executive Officer

   Minimum    Six Month
Target

T.J. Rodgers

   —      329,618

Brad W. Buss

   —      206,011

Christopher Seams

   —      164,809

Paul Keswick

   —      164,809

Norman Taffe

   —      141,633

The Six Month Target number of shares is the maximum that may be earned for the Performance Period.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

49


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
Date: August 7, 2009   By:  

/s/    BRAD W. BUSS

    Brad W. Buss
   

Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration

and Chief Financial Officer

 

50


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

31.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

51

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T.J. Rodgers, certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation;

 

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: August 7, 2009   By:  

/s/    T.J. RODGERS

    T.J. Rodgers
    President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brad W. Buss, certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation;

 

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: August 7, 2009   By:  

/s/    BRAD W. BUSS

    Brad W. Buss
   

Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration

and Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T.J. Rodgers, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation for the quarter ended June 28, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation.

 

Dated: August 7, 2009   By:  

/s/    T.J. RODGERS

    T.J. Rodgers
    President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brad W. Buss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation for the quarter ended June 28, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation.

 

Dated: August 7, 2009   By:  

/s/    BRAD W. BUSS

    Brad W. Buss
    Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer